IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0280712DB0F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.127
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZNsE3tH7ZAIL for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A30C12DB6C for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id a5so2886033ita.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2EoTlg5V9EmIUTFLslE4o5DqOTFCFWAvy20fnbCOHiI=; b=QwMOKk+aA/V//DwVDKb32ENyENBiPXDY2kmEDstFhX0bA+SVVW2ePurfXt7tQy0RnV JXfC1fnZvhadYJYvyXqBweby+ZACTXEIZbJio9G69zkjLuxvVofjTGoMQ3tydKG8YIoh 1KIkHTIhwKQ2deNpTzA9GdXBUOt/vju8MADmxRDHfKp4efTcEe+JFgylr66/p/+vWTEd S/K7nsDjkFntD+wd+3NH/rcsSkJKCBBhlGKzy4iViuffzCVAifIa/H1/KUt6jzFh9uZC qwIHXelBFfAAhcHK/0hSIJHw3pIgVBleoMvmcWGXtiQ9SQ4WvM1ItOT/2PR1NdnKikNw lLYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2EoTlg5V9EmIUTFLslE4o5DqOTFCFWAvy20fnbCOHiI=; b=QzqnsUhqCp7+pN1poRMtJmGcdZORqKDgpzzsuWTYWArdzN0cOZaLjJTIvXcWAjPMZI Dh69oLaDn20dAUEvo4DZ0UyEpktAm2x9yzf7fv2HTUv4DvuKwyydaTdBHsynYWwvE3KX J71MBVzhyU+SYE90ZTLuA3bkmRVYEZ8+I+Sp7RKdtOja/0S+cZr6SJKuePp9GFuTyT7h /yzxEEVjQkauH61FvPsOPx/ecvbKMfVesvq2I3DGOdRj7BZXuv15YCdJ9DvUv7Sf1irc EfFv+lF36XLDAunjXMEFX+LXLy8pg1yQfRSs3SxPxE32lgjmOapPSCIGgdiAkmYdrPsq uNkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJKCqTes//Tl4XvAfQ7cFJacHZ/ItSAq828RIagvAtl2AQrshUNml0rZlXpVgKBwgxsTWKd0ZUbtKE3Qkq9
X-Received: by 10.36.58.81 with SMTP id m78mr747691itm.95.1466197471497; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.67.74 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6068.1466169439@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <76ed7404-35ff-9cc8-262b-d5785595465c@isc.org> <4598.1466104881@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <87porgafsq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <6068.1466169439@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:04:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAedzxpN9_LABnhevtkukgng_q4ZSJWc_-L8rkDQ9W4ZtYOe2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/J2maO20XX4L2ydaohc8-Ucd8ZtA>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:04:35 -0000

> That's definitely a good point. Outlook should have a bug that the English
> translation of "Re" is wrong.
>
>     > (The right choice for Homenet, of course, is ".domus".  Although, now
>     > that I think about it, RFC 1034 doesn't mention whether domain names
>     > are in the nominative or the locative, so perhaps we should also
>     > consider ".domo".)
>
> I'm open to this idea... I prefer domus.

Of course, like the redefinition of what "arpa" stands for (see RFC
referred to early), we could just decide that "home" stands for
"Household or Medium-sized Entity" (or some other suitably
entertaining and descriptive acronym) and then file the appropriate
requesting paperwork.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email