IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] homenet-prefix-assignment update - behaviour at one ISP

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 08 October 2014 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA53F1A03F9 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tbnDXF80SZzG for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EFD01A03A3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id s98D1KUi002941; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:01:20 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A6E2208E1A; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:02:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93BC202FEA; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:02:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id s98D1Cis012162; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:01:20 +0200
Message-ID: <54353598.2050108@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:01:12 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <A0C73AEC-6D0F-498B-9BDD-D6AF91202CCB@darou.fr> <54350D62.5050706@gmail.com> <048F40EB-A1D5-4D70-986B-9DDE55FF7C22@darou.fr> <543526D9.2020107@gmail.com> <FD386567-2DFE-4484-8F5A-794CF9C438F0@darou.fr> <54352E33.1030505@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410081434060.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se> <54353356.1090805@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410081454470.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410081454470.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/JX3DMoPGCIlaf7V6gHsxynAbl6Q
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet-prefix-assignment update - behaviour at one ISP
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:01:25 -0000

Le 08/10/2014 14:55, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>
>> Le 08/10/2014 14:34, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>>>
>>>> as I could have divided it differently, or I could have announced the
>>>> /61 in RA in the first link of the homenet, etc.
>>>
>>> Why on earth would you want to do that?
>>
>> divide differently? or /61 in RA?
>
> Divide at anything else than /64.

I meant a /61 can be divided in 8 /64s, or in 4 /64s plus 2 /63s, right? 
  There are some configuration advantages for the latter.


> A=1 in SLAAC doesn't work unless
> you're using /64 subnet size.

I didnt know that?  Can you elaborate?  Is it that I can not set radvd 
with A=1 and plen=63?  Or is it that the Host receiving this RA will not 
know what do with this RA?

Alex

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email