IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791721200B3 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mTVl6rbk4kxE for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1EA120020 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id o44so11216068ota.10 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 08:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=UXa+r+eaVKE0toDpIJQ3aImqNolxMIYIqjFM/DUKDSc=; b=sr7EpqiMPsVc+VRIqntcmSOl7DCIbpYAkStui7/wpGRKGLD1vEpH82JW3Yj2hgZg5S yEEVxmn4wX7UfNrXXsj66MWUYjiZwAnW0WIfSk6BCeqW1oUr5qgJJpSWZi7fz4+cL842 iaLcjeQ8p6PY9sZ1iu5kyuuujKyTqFHXGKUs1pU/ssxEqNMrLf2XJsFWbEZSS9Ueug7m hWV6iWNCV+TDRCzXHiaUBOPWD6TOzLKtGNKO7VAAnh62UmzJKzGfzOKAH7QguRdJXjsy Nc6Nt5x3SjnjR9YgpaynaGEJlUZY4gXn5Ds0r/l0OCd3ogY8XrZB+xq8KU4btaswk22I SwAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=UXa+r+eaVKE0toDpIJQ3aImqNolxMIYIqjFM/DUKDSc=; b=N+GIPUu1WD1GtRbvWUsp/obNRFnz+9fqrtWunrs36WwZ5NwaR58+ylxFo1o6csmErs GJLbac3dm9Sre+/qrCWGrlTs3I9rrxsClZlmoCDcNUPFZpfr3CF70f+gE0WAZ90Zl+98 6IVPLu4VXm9oGGBjWOODY3U0YHLZfWC1gKBLqiHyXyspJoNEviKXxSHQ9+jzrFYG1JmC 3C8DQksBfWU68dUEiowHVmQ/TlSPGZXN+k3mhZpcor/HEfD4Cy8gmc/IfW1wIeANBwXX iEucs2S0+MfuDODXJdWnB0mX3WEVo2ECl1hKMYldU/sfVV9w9HK3QiydbTs1D6iL6/Q5 ouYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVz28Nzh8RvCOjlKIjyQctx52B/HASnEH8AukHC7jSPOyBpPGNZ yDzkZTs8I6IpuhRWXFE76dj9Tg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIY25sdfIJZTIRzjR29zzATs4OFi/3KT6n9AWrDvF07Z6V4G+aBXx77WMzCA3rhTeG5k4hVg==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3663:: with SMTP id w90mr21915089otb.288.1570460642253; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 08:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.9.60] (cpe-24-243-152-218.rgv.res.rr.com. [24.243.152.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d194sm4652589oib.47.2019.10.07.08.04.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 08:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D8315FBC-6093-4B0A-A254-5480A8ED0503"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3600\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <13214054-d457-44b1-9284-e6295af802fd@email.android.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:03:59 -0500
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Markus Stenberg <homenet@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <66B2B7A2-59B9-4FEB-B75A-4F9EF324BF8C@fugue.com>
References: <13214054-d457-44b1-9284-e6295af802fd@email.android.com>
To: RayH <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3600)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/KqOR3xcCIBfsz4RwR1qASFYOl6Q>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:04:04 -0000

On Oct 7, 2019, at 10:00 AM, RayH <v6ops@globis.net> wrote:
> Why does an ISP have to add complexity to their network in order to support Homenet?

If the ISP is on the hook for support, then “their network” includes your home network.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email