IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 23 September 2013 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B890421F922A for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.143, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id klEXXhcAn1be for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899DF21F91BF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [50.0.18.227] (fakinks.mtcc.com [50.0.18.227] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r8NEKIkG027816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:20:19 -0700
Message-ID: <52404E22.3040500@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:20:18 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|72d902bbed65dc8b06cf46c298d30fe1p8I0CV03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <E01ACFFF-CA8F-4280-8CE0-2CC57E6270EE@nominum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919074156.0cd2d900@elandnews.com> <3105F809-7E03-41D9-A634-DE32446FB19B@nominum.com> <523B659D.2000408@gmail.com> <F89B607A-EC62-41F8-8138-268F0C89A1FF@piuha.net> <523C64F7.5080107@mtcc.com> <82F09828-CA33-4378-8B09-3B4B6F4764FA@fugue.com> <523CD1A2.2040006@mtcc.com> <B34C8A90-B173-4676-907C-88AB41D35597@fugue.com> <523F8513.1040504@mtcc.com> <A6F7D9FA-9AF3-4468-9E6F-A18E2234DDAD@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <A6F7D9FA-9AF3-4468-9E6F-A18E2234DDAD@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=513; t=1379946020; x=1380810020; c=relaxed/simple; s=thundersaddle.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[homenet]=20APPSDIR=20review=20of=20dra ft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 |Sender:=20 |To:=20Ted=20Lemon=20<mellon@fugue.com> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20 format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=8/6Zq49Hm8hQqCGsV+PxOlKbKb4NIRE0hJqDXSDPPgE=; b=RQuhSBaTQs3CDKvW5q+VprSTmOgyE5/7zgR9hJhK1Vj45Ov9oUI41Y5J8Z c+gJGc1RbWBr9giJD9i6Zl7q3pCZKh0dIFB9zNuC8Hw9obGM5lCr3lXOV91i 79Ty9HHXR89/ypR+hBSp6aVlLRfxcbKaAtVNiCgeUxZ3noBovqfu4=;
Authentication-Results: ; v=0.1; dkim=pass header.i=mike@mtcc.com ( sig from mtcc.com/thundersaddle.kirkwood verified; ); dkim-asp=pass header.From=mike@mtcc.com
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:20:30 -0000

On 09/23/2013 05:42 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
>> Yes. It was dhcp-centric which makes it an isp-only play which is not general enough.
> Huh?

Unless something has changed since they presented at an ietf about a 
year and
a half ago, it was very isp-centric.

In any case, it's generated next to no list traffic since then that I 
recall, and it's
certainly not been taken up as a working group document. So what's your 
point?

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email