Re: [homenet] primary / secondary configuration

I agree, however,  think that we are moving toward what we want to
implement, though with various level of integrations. My point was that we
come with a description that works for different use cases and extensions.
Yours,
Daniel

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> On Jun 18, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
> wrote:
>
> I am also questioning on whether we should provide some sort of
> recommendations for the UI. While we are not UI designers, I believe some
> properties could be interesting for designers, and those may be helpful to
> be provided.
>
>
> The trouble that we have gotten into repeatedly in this working group is
> that we write the specification in anticipation of an implementation,
> rather than on the basis of experience doing an implementation.   We have a
> fantastic testbed for this: OpenWRT.   I am at this point somewhat expert
> in doing OpenWRT builds.   Rather than speculating about what we need to
> say, why not do an implementation, see how it works, and then do a writeup
> based on what we learned?   We’re already talking about doing this at the
> Hackathon.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>