Re: [homenet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 15 March 2015 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080E91A03D5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DdWUSFLq7Psv for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com (mail-pd0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DEF1A03C7 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbop1 with SMTP id op1so20988366pdb.2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lw9JSPRW5OAa4YtxC7tt+4Z0C5mQthrSDx3TnYYkxrM=; b=jEGAOGm99XaVMjJH1X+xqTEG6jNlYOzavGJYX3zIp7FkYjzQ1LLgAFD8s5J0pPEByV DhcLf99z4GKK5Z5gCkdqtLgFiPMDDEj2eHB0AdUBDM/3UbAAP1Jf9UFenhtzZJgk0v0Y OzbhHZgPehltf32/3WDI+PO/ihZSclV2uZyn8S+U9q9IIAMYXgpkJqZ9tPjwQY6kYIws yklfovRpmSuzMniwcYjHvQ1eOpOMXC+UOsQ3ujufiX4yEODCeW1qZ4eCdW1rG01ZCUbN rbwAnKmvf6IJor6NGbjSfAXQrz4elWVoDJUczYbspm3jmXlpC+QduXyycJMyZD4ylaz8 OvNw==
X-Received: by 10.66.233.194 with SMTP id ty2mr60286322pac.4.1426377956558; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6238:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6238:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm10029628pdm.31.2015.03.14.17.05.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5504CCDE.709@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:05:50 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
References: <20150217193324.25368.88002.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADZyTknR_5Csm+gD_BbtNtKYxdycuikeyHt+cxMuqWw3fHvdkQ@mail.gmail.com> <54F6F93F.8030602@globis.net> <CADZyTk=57sH=_T1HDF_vv8CKwPyjpQpXqzP5v+FzwPBqOdx9sw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTk=57sH=_T1HDF_vv8CKwPyjpQpXqzP5v+FzwPBqOdx9sw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/M48e1km3zJdHH7i9-4iPDlQS100>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 00:05:59 -0000

> When a renumbering operation occurs, the CPE IP prefix is modified. As a
> result, IP addresses of the Homenet DNS(SEC) Zone are not valid anymore --
> as we assume the DNS(SEC) Homenet only has global reachable IP addresses.
> In addition, the Slave cannot anymore reach its master.

That seems to assume a break-before-make renumbering. The preferred
scenario is make-before-break, although we need to be able to support
both. I hope you can adjust the text to allow both.

    Brian