Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EC01A87AF for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3C7IuXCvvncu for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4161A8A08 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.63] (c-71-201-198-58.hsd1.il.comcast.net [71.201.198.58]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E94C12380423; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:20:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <343f28c2c9f04db7b82e827307ef95bc@BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:20:10 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D53A8F66-0A74-4725-9EB7-E969CC3C70F1@fugue.com>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <343f28c2c9f04db7b82e827307ef95bc@BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/MST2KlzmhCHkPihaOgNke_-6PI8
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:20:15 -0000

On Oct 14, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com> wrote:
> I can confirm that.  We have a customer handing out a new prefix every 4 days.

But let's be clear: is your customer doing flash renumbering, or gracefully renumbering?   If they are flash renumbering, are they doing it because they had a choice, knew they had a choice, and chose flash renumbering over graceful renumbering, or are they doing it because it's the solution you offered them?