Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt
"Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net> Wed, 23 October 2019 08:55 UTC
Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FC81200B7 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fNPamtqmAr51 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (92-111-140-212.static.v4.ziggozakelijk.nl [92.111.140.212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5865312007A for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FC240137; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at globis01.globis.net
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5dPkJkAWFsc; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MacBook-Pro-3.local (h9041.upc-h.chello.nl [62.194.9.41]) (Authenticated sender: v6ops@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70922400FF; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
References: <CAA93jw7ervnQEEipR_KJDgDpEauzxSabZxg_3jkKgDk4X5AoAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>
Message-ID: <deaa63b0-0b41-973a-bf6a-bc5e7fa6078b@globis.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7ervnQEEipR_KJDgDpEauzxSabZxg_3jkKgDk4X5AoAA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D09AAD8B9EAD43E5A9EDB8EE"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/N_jMBwBA65QrA5c8zI05LqVnLuA>
Subject: Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:55:40 -0000
Dave Taht wrote on 23/10/2019 08:56: > has anyone here had much chance to review this? > Thanks for the prompt. From a pure Homenet perspective, it reinforces that L3 routing is the correct solution for segmenting networks where end nodes have different characteristics. e.g. battery powered or different underlying LAN technology. And maybe we need a firewall in front of those segments to prevent inbound scanning traffic overloading the link. Other than that I'm not sure it says much more than "Multicast is great for efficiency, until it isn't". Section 3.2.4: > On a wired network, there is not a huge difference between unicast, multicast and broadcast traffic. I'd dispute this statement as being overly generic. Anyway, it doesn't add much to the discussion (about wireless). The majority of modern wired Ethernets are actually effectively point to point networks, with multicast and broadcast being emulated in silicon or software. Although maybe having a less visible impact than on wireless, multicast and broadcast can also have some similar operational impact on wired networks (waking nodes unnecessarily, switching via a slow (software) path in the main processor, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6583 etc.). -- regards, RayH <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
- [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mb… Dave Taht
- Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iet… Ray Hunter (v6ops)
- Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iet… christophe.lohr
- Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iet… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)