IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] primary / secondary configuration

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 18 June 2019 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C00120129 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1ehYQPyGcAr for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6704120115 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id x47so15876772qtk.11 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=plD6EwxxI8RmkZ78uWn2NRFdkmB2pvcTUpqmZuF07Fg=; b=nw+NIZtLJmEQM4g1x7z8u6fgHMp36If5ZVuWVzBQOKAChQQPidRu8+c+wOmEeEipl0 2DxxPvaNrQzqITROBwS0RJ1a/qh86dQfthBrvOlpw59VXPr97O0jPx5TTL6bTdhumP35 dZzmY/0hlBsnje47N/2YYBcUaPjHOb5WA5mqswFDxm34TbiLfDfHHabnFsivB9zKkqL9 sFWvuX3180tMolVk4M0DHoxAiwNiKODu0ueWcZoYa9yGNIC7jOCHo0ROojvOVWuomnUW HKOozKmZ9zeUGKlFlqx6T6HEh6I8uVejHobA657HxWrbjllp1KENeZfeUr9o+P/6rVrl eN+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=plD6EwxxI8RmkZ78uWn2NRFdkmB2pvcTUpqmZuF07Fg=; b=CSbpYBp6zekE2IzHmdyi+glsk+GO5/xZaoQH4UZYAIvjR03i9KNzItT4EZEj+i5qmv OIVh9AclvmBRxiFgqED7n2QqsOOMOmmsmxz2/iDnjQtJQVs/e6fLt9Ro5kH7kR/dj/70 ZiMZgjAfGMq7Lj14EiRyzx5WcEhs82xjw25FnLYe0Ae+d441CfNKVclmIlpezpgmEtPV pk2g1TpMoxEjl3tLjCdjoOQHQNeIyJ9X/ZsZOelEmBC0mYIkI3AE3H6D4QAXwFJA/ex3 YQnL9wnx6sqvhjXnv8VK14n3qyE0W2KVfbWrpvwe6+k0AQ/CM97z8UZA0yjC56Li9dMU unrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2pqF4T1sBOHusmjO9e6h4gI22PSyXJgVA3hmfv7yF7w3HkK2O Et/Pa3Sc4uqYtOPa8AUSxTfoXw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyxVW2JHfBH+Go3nWPuHfa4oUvckOK9KPlE6pow7zQniIZ6p6CrGrnAkJ2zjPDqdz8YMd6Neg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:264a:: with SMTP id v10mr68917806qtv.255.1560873105929; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:c1a2:1:c806:4a3a:3f15:b80b? ([2001:470:c1a2:1:c806:4a3a:3f15:b80b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h40sm10734959qth.4.2019.06.18.08.51.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <2BE7CAA7-D079-4BC4-8753-C4CFE01AD2EA@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4F8AA751-61A5-4FF8-B361-847BE004BF8E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:51:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkkT11gkokdYgQF8AgUd2c1-ZhMFkWx0_XV7SvuiG33AVA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>, homenet <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
References: <CADZyTknGV8huQzVrQcJgFu82HGkOhBe9Q2f23bBXYT8-WOjtPg@mail.gmail.com> <07b0d046-1a1e-7019-49df-46a9470eab48@globis.net> <CADZyTknZNOa9asX49DGbxKFpd1gkgHAkSxyeyH77zOfd__O=eg@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTkkT11gkokdYgQF8AgUd2c1-ZhMFkWx0_XV7SvuiG33AVA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/NlFIYsgy2mBUXQSqHEiqVfwqR5A>
Subject: Re: [homenet] primary / secondary configuration
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:51:49 -0000

On Jun 18, 2019, at 11:47 AM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> wrote:
> The question to the WG is whether this worth being tried, or if we are missing something. Any thoughts, feed back would be appreciated. 

The way such feedback is generated is through experience…

I happen to think that it’s worth at least talking about how this information is managed, and talking about what a management API would look like should be in scope.   Talking about what the UI should look like that sits on top of that API?   Out of scope.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email