Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 12 June 2014 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5391A02E8 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QDeIqNkmgdB for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87CE1A02BE for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E892002A; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:48:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 87F2763B0E; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:44:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7034A63B0B; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:44:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <BEB843C7-EB1D-486A-A9A1-B99D48775D33@nominet.org.uk>
References: <BEB843C7-EB1D-486A-A9A1-B99D48775D33@nominet.org.uk>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:44:19 -0400
Message-ID: <1055.1402613059@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/NoggTWLivZI3lndG_4ieed1Bewk
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:44:32 -0000

Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote:
    > You may have noticed multiple revisions of draft-ietf-homenet-arch posted
    > recently. After many iterations and a ton of work for our Editor In Chief, Tim
    > Chown, all IESG “DISCUSS” positions have been resolved to either “Yes” or “No
    > Objection”, with the exception of one “Abstain” from one of our Routing Area
    > ADs who had requested that the following text be added to section 3.5:

wow...

    > The Chairs felt that the first half of this text was unnecessarily prescriptive
    > for this document and did not reflect something the WG had achieved consensus

I agree.

    > In addition, one small change was introduced in the -15 revision based on WG
    > feedback where a reference to Source Specific Multicast [RFC 4607] was
    > introduced, but had not been called out explicitly in London or before. That
    > change is as follows:

    > Old:
    > It is desirable that, subject to the capacities of devices on certain
    > media types, multicast routing is supported across the homenet.

    > New:
    > It is desirable that, subject to the capacities of devices on certain
    > media types, multicast routing is supported across the homenet,
    > including source-specific multicast (SSM) [RFC4607].

    > The WGLC will commence immediately after the -16 is posted, and will last for
    > two weeks.

    > We very much want your feedback here, but are not aiming to revisit the
    > document in its entirety. As such, we would like to limit the scope of the WGLC
    > to just the text quoted in this email.

I will attempt to read the diffs; but... It Just Doesn't Matter<tm>
better is the enemy of good enough, and it was good enough a year ago.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-