Re: [homenet] Working Group draft adoptions

Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> Wed, 24 September 2014 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3821A7016 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 703ef24jtKI8 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F39AE1A7000 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id mc6so10299654lab.20 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=Q5AQ4fWxWV53RZAzqjcw+AuuDAoDnTQxQU/Bfrgna7Q=; b=i6nHmiBF/UA93c5yJaJwQ7f+UwGbn8sBfjlP4YrWkZalQjkLbv/jgPGdfqn50psJP3 WSlrf+ZMXULrc9C3N8o6CBZh7SKKz+T5mVblp1giVNnyt72zNEq2B5x5bRRlaZIdwUi9 PrO9WXu3GfUKn8ly+eRLnJHXTeuaDyhYwcG12ddh2qZ8bZ2+dM8Q+AhjtGPg+IAuh0Wp ZmwADA53MShrQlEYj9YyHjLmA8d5hm0ndXWgKqkzIacdrVi4ynvG+Sxb2JizHVZsNzvH PBdyKi3UTS3V+zfnrMEo0J7PYTs/ZF8hNGno2ui6nmj7tlPD0PG0Xk8CjHdXOQstrsuX 8Fvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfvYx8e6izwwhs8UyUurUHjzsO/6xHBSaIAOXhFawj/q91+Ew5G304QdpNbUbFcNydRlq/
X-Received: by 10.152.18.165 with SMTP id x5mr6016539lad.42.1411557542082; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.46.5] ([79.170.214.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm5660362lag.21.2014.09.24.04.19.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D201)
In-Reply-To: <8109.1411508472@sandelman.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:19:00 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <49FC8204-C7B1-4442-81E2-946AA5CE5477@townsley.net>
References: <0530DB0A-AA87-45E2-925D-C5C186FCE772@nominet.org.uk> <8109.1411508472@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/OXa_wlB73Bj-az6chjACJQn6KBA
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Working Group draft adoptions
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:19:07 -0000

Thanks for the review, late is still welcome.

As for IPv4, as you alluded to, we are chartered to develop solutions that work dual-stack where we can, as long as we are not making harmful concessions to the v6 design due to v4 consideration. 

- Mark

(Thumbtyped)

> On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:41 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Late, but:
> 
> I have read draft-pfister-homenet-prefix-assignment.  Adopt it.
> I thought I read it before, but maybe not.  It all seems familiar, but what's
> with all the IPv4 stuff?  I guess we are doing an IPv4 thing, because we can,
> and it's useful to be able to turn off detect that have multiple potential
> DHCPv4 servers, and turn them off if we can.
> 
> I think that we should remove:
>> If the delegated prefix is too small
>>   given the size of the network, prefixes of arbitrary lengths may
>>   be used.
> 
> and stick to 64-bit for all the why-64 reasons.  Let's not talk about any
> other options.    This document also seems to interoperate with (CableLabs)
> HIP.
> 
> draft-mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation
> draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options
> 
> I have read previous versions of these documents, and upon looking again, I
> see lots of shiny new text, and I like it all.   While there are many people
> who are very scared of having home devices in DNS, and many are worried that
> they will be forced somehow to do so, I don't think any such comments matter.
> This is, like almost all protocols the IETF creates, optional to enable.
> Please adopt these documents.
> 
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet