IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] webauthn for routers

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 13 June 2019 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20CD1205DC for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id si7IUHjcT5c0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583571205D6 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id t8so139058qkt.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=+JJaQD6YDlZCDFt8mnlrGEymjdb48CaUmRaUIAi7CMw=; b=orYV62d+dJjt6s/lF19zSkDTnw4cBN4ht4Mpe7j4h2r9elbZx4oLS5ZIrn3SF6lI0i p/XZ5kM0Tmv7vnq3xW59C7/9YsrLWv3/oIhbt2w0yqXnoIHN/yOiCPZXbxPkX8g329M6 s8Us6QnDfpUAGoXja0BnjLgqLL4nwSsIov3un5G5cSf/35eBiwLeAjCph7bkO+uVd71K wkSU5+tqYlaOG+tdgAD6TCNkbC7qtudmLciQ5xb9lGsEPkfKNNWS+xJrxKroZF2TK59U Oue72B2HG17T0yv/EPje1wRH63Quftlj3ug4iqmjCD1q6qP/JNy6Z8mGptSvNkRS69BA 56TA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=+JJaQD6YDlZCDFt8mnlrGEymjdb48CaUmRaUIAi7CMw=; b=nbw+N8jeUJQ+tYezIjAGDdzevV/CpIjvf7BlswGU2ui5SXVwAV0im1ZZrIqLKhDl/m yoRKe0JQBK7hNQHbRC6XnnjV6fpnsgGDOddHtqWPUpa4lb/XAiSKfmJFKTCm/EgqtXNS baD5AccNTRsOX/CPszehshK83/oHOg0py5irKT2abCYQjxecPd98csgy2We335tTn73e l6w+pVBzDmxOnmbwGxjIdCufG23k1p3UwZP+Wwid2wKhdeB0xAXxI9YH1TAFmMhwRxeZ MfcTtoSURuptw0XmG1C1rRuaT6DUn3gCxUIuZZ4ny0CEuVFJctuUlWZcUOzXk1e5RfuC UhFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXYhmAtDd1LtbqDJ4IS40tH1gJcmAMqiZhmo8mYAfS1mlIk8xQr ZfSpnE+ER1Oi3SUGSmWvh87Rkg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyaWZ3qt+/BeDjhkc0BjULdF1cYBEW0fHDSTuxGeBf4dODUTMf192xiTfEVauVNnbZzFBphmA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa8e:: with SMTP id t136mr5916947qke.222.1560453492513; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.34] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l40sm400611qtc.51.2019.06.13.12.18.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <306AAFBA-39D0-489A-8698-F31A6C4BEC78@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1D650F9E-5243-483A-B684-61799790134D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:18:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <d633bcce-cd61-6e86-ae7c-0aa26c7ed815@fresheez.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, homenet@ietf.org
To: Michael Thomas <mike@fresheez.com>
References: <CADZyTkkgd8f49V+yoZvPZXx3b-_YRzpgUY1-obroq9QMLnFWNw@mail.gmail.com> <878su8fj24.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2348.1560261275@localhost> <87ftofwqut.wl-jch@irif.fr> <27503.1560302791@localhost> <87ef3zwoew.wl-jch@irif.fr> <4109.1560349340@localhost> <EC7FDA4F-1859-4B35-A8AC-D33E1A96F979@fugue.com> <ff7f2700-3862-59bd-abfb-22589562bddb@mtcc.com> <20218.1560366783@localhost> <288a310b-3b99-748d-74ce-a878ff43ee77@fresheez.com> <6179.1560377924@localhost> <604b4062-f2c5-30af-73ff-2e97b7541a9b@fresheez.com> <30470.1560435490@localhost> <cde3329b-cc06-b4eb-5d87-cf74f21368ea@fresheez.com> <496DBED4-24E6-49FE-B9D3-C2BFC7ACEE98@fugue.com> <20d72a3f-0b8f-c958-2482-25358854a96e@fresheez.com> <384451EC-7938-48B6-B167-1C246385C6D7@fugue.com> <fc40f26f-0dc3-91bb-03a0-7e7d8820e931@fresheez.com> <3461D44E-DD00-485D-B1CB-2F5356653403@fugue.com> <4167255a-9766-d155-cafa-44a27bec9a45@fresheez.com> <6B0BD10A-52A8-4DA6-82E2-BE4196041EE4@fugue.com> <d633bcce-cd61-6e86-ae7c-0aa26c7ed815@fresheez.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/P7rFvKn8k6Or2L-txptZrl4bq4U>
Subject: Re: [homenet] webauthn for routers
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:18:20 -0000

TBH I don’t know anything about OBA other than that I heard it discussed.  If you want to write up a draft, that can’t hurt.   I’m not promising to support it—it depends on what you come up with.   But it’s always good to have a place to start, and something to pick apart and fix up.   So by all means, if you are willing to proceed on that basis, I think it’s a good idea, and I will read it.

> On Jun 13, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Michael Thomas <mike@fresheez.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/13/19 12:02 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On Jun 13, 2019, at 2:57 PM, Michael Thomas <mike@fresheez.com <mailto:mike@fresheez.com>> wrote:
>>> The meta-question is whether there is something to be done here, and if this wg is the right place to do it. I know there was a security part of the charter... it sure would be nice to set an example for all of this IoT mischief on how to do a proper web login interface.
>>> 
>>> 
>> This is a general problem, not an IoT problem.  IoT is a good motivating use case, not the complete problem.   We’ve talked about working on this problem here before. I think it’s in scope and this is a good place to do it.  Iff people are willing to participate!
>> 
>> 
> 
> Should I write up a draft? It would be really good that something (convergent) evolved out Stephen, Paul and my rfc 7486, as the first thing I experimented on was something for a home router based application :)
> 
> Mike, who has no idea if the webauth folks had any idea about our hoba stuff.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email