Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED4B120096 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WTy51PQuj0m2 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x343.google.com (mail-ot1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::343]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56E3120020 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x343.google.com with SMTP id k32so10915092otc.4 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mWd1d/NzUE1vovkHijw2c6B7403LcL5kGC9qXOh6rVQ=; b=dAEAEPg1LQA9EjobHkFJMJQ6U46CrdtzTABcTMotXh2tit+tqRa8w+JW72bK2myGwL 0xi92/4GFh1NlHhjfrmhp1bjtrFYrFZdp/vFW1wTChJVLE1H0yPkTj9gDgLedve4TpJB uTb7l94yF9EAzFjZ7PfsZ9nmZTohweSz6RIVys8dCXY6pbx7alcRgaOaxD3OUonVs9Nb L0tJmp6u301r0h10HySLr1g3r9y82ZAZ3VnQQY+s9mgYAVDOg54q/hE52oLXHyIafUY8 4Nd4D2Tbne8d5MqPRVzYWVsnLh+xQk5St3g7pE/LT7cxwb1gvYW8Nhh+/xRJke8C/Mnb vGeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mWd1d/NzUE1vovkHijw2c6B7403LcL5kGC9qXOh6rVQ=; b=aGXCngabFRWYwC/HWwMuubWHZvcFE/OmO3ooa8REPU04OJPVsp1K30gOrLYL6cXvWp 9Cn+2s9AQ+1pRLOFCxDS6wYSb+RZrTvpMhqvlHpvGhYAGKJvx3zyhVfVsfY6Um3QB0Ft ihHBqWEaVeYwpQWVfrkfkoBMblfIJHwrSzxg16FXRAv+K2XnHzdVS/mTj84vcN3CQu0h SldqTt8ftrnqWctelXUYv6H7ASScO1q2oNG3yBjIAzRjgeSndhNl6v/6il2xQk7XU03w rfOCkr4OipcRoW4zfv8SSLGLZ3jYuxvjIgP7FRrHovSu37IH+rvO4v6ABv8p3P+/agWs LGfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSneKMQbW+1H8/148Xa+xDhJjjPBAYHSRheay7+kqv0+vNzSLB uGZe+xbrHbTUttWBM7yT5Rhgl9TPKdY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwyScMczVMyrHz9NQC6jPYm/XHuwYoseIRHKACIHS9xNRhbacWI+lHk+tkSr6JCXkLmt6XVOg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:18c1:: with SMTP id v1mr19511086ote.305.1570454720205; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.254.144.120] (072-182-058-035.res.spectrum.com. [72.182.58.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s194sm4461274oie.19.2019.10.07.06.25.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <E04F6C5E-230A-46B5-97EB-6CC071F3D38F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B26AAA9-5F97-4693-95E6-789587A2C641"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3600\))
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:25:19 -0700
In-Reply-To: <173c6dc4-b3de-b85c-1cd7-7a1ea254f7f8@gmail.com>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <56255ECF-9002-4440-BA0D-665EFC4BA9C6@fugue.com> <173c6dc4-b3de-b85c-1cd7-7a1ea254f7f8@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3600)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Pa81JCVOavtx7rZ6oND48gRGWMk>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:25:22 -0000

On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:33 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> If somebody makes a good solution and easily deployed for the topology
> in the above figure, then I am willing to consider it for vehicular
> networks as well.  In them, the CE Router is a Mobile Router in the car
> and the Internal Router is one of many other routers in the car.  The
> ISP is a cellular network and, potentially, an 802.11-OCB network.

Would ULAs work for your use case, or do you need routing to the Internet from the leaf network?