Re: [homenet] Dynamic metrics in IS-IS

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6621B5D41 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aR-oM4fq8ZSm for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 586DC1B5D37 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so56567171wic.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=FqOtSBL3uuS7c8M7T7p7N9xzdkgvKUbwx/cYHtwV+XA=; b=DKwzXeE7tgd/vAmxhbggNsxLCuVSwbfDBa8xs4czOw2HJ5MJV4KsKRhsPQ+Ilr4sP2 x6ns13fbb3tWkWnyK9d3O6xxU/muFw+7TWgpvBlXpmD0fRmaENYemZKrj3l05DK2eWCt EgRQQagmqwvQaPVC9lXG1dHAwhZRFaic8nn1CDpGpKw4dv/RBfZFHZJO5TtNy4HA0XIp Z1uBxyxeFen6zavLR2QsHxczKg2Y3FgYIoG2yM9MYTT9n2UNvvpjKM6630xloQa5knTk 2/m70jaZwitKa6+5GVfTrDg3ltYw4DBE8BN4/Av2qL2cdFzHQQo3MXPE6gO7ZkZG0eW2 o5iw==
X-Received: by 10.180.105.196 with SMTP id go4mr3890748wib.36.1443611911830; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.81.81 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zj04tb1a.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <55FA3EF5.6000704@opensourcerouting.org> <87mvwjprwl.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAGnRvure=W90ZYpaVSJBLoTzq=6ypE3ef-XEmHSzLPZdV+BT-Q@mail.gmail.com> <87io6t5doi.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509301026250.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <87k2r8uuz4.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509301208141.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <877fn8ur89.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509301247110.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <87zj04tb1a.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:18:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuoeyYw6+R1JXjE6qa-85WCbEddXtpekGAoqrtRvp=2sMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/R3SRYhU4TPPrkN_6pckqTSL74W4>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Dynamic metrics in IS-IS
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:18:35 -0000

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> a valid test of the metric setting features would be to have two wifi
>> networks, one 2.4GHz, one 5Ghz, two different L2s, different IP
>> networks, and then walk around with two clients connected together with
>> a network cable, and check if the routing would change from the 5GHz
>> network to the 2.4GHz network as distance from the AP increases and the
>> 5GHz network stops working.
>
> That would be an interesting test if you can show that Christian's code
> works better in this case than plain IS-IS and not much worse than
> a recent babeld.  Both in an unloaded network and under load (10Mbit/s
> constant-rate UDP is what I like to test against, but some people think
> that TCP is more realistic).

The Wifi stress testing script Dave Taht brought to the Battlemesh V8
might also be interesting for this... 10 Mbit/s UDP traffic will be
really tame on a modern wifi. Even multihop 100 Mbit/s could not dent
or test mesh on the Battlemesh V8.

http://docs.battlemesh.org/v8/3-blowing-up-the-network.html#test

Henning Rogge