IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] lack of discussion

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8211E3A07AF for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mGFvGgcJmNSg for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD313A0755 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com with SMTP id n22so2337081vkm.7 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 08:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6LtV9OXN9XNs5DgbkvTOhSlhtvy6lK4XJOMwhI9NSy8=; b=J+oVMS4g8m9UuePSd5jWvI6pkuedfIhutrksEklSu4jxJUnO9N3zp2j13QeZ8QTGMj p8fo2jEttHtxukYF2s25BhbSSzkVuGWfOq0QfUHp6UxIm6fuQu6PX1QHW+35uDuQ6oer MDlUx1ACAeqCG0zo/hX6cZi+dqeZWhgdkRCfhFP96q+IIs0WCJu14TVzgDOaZgn3TuWm 6MSBO6mvb3rxQlyjLN1r61tz8dq9tjINcBX9WQ8pkOqBtLC61Ud87ZWKNfDI3xfzOdkx xqCWqL+AYeh37/+9eS+E0Vd+0H3pMp8WBgtj2ndoWS66yUw8PoCYPArpWIF5CrkQDB/9 c5qA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6LtV9OXN9XNs5DgbkvTOhSlhtvy6lK4XJOMwhI9NSy8=; b=O/64cgmQl74IC1+dQFIHTngH5l2NhTB/NVu9h6nps/apwvTq8QBfvkIKwK2WcI3TbW sMFiUU3YkZYy42Q21j60ulbJ7xDpijC9rqhUlN9uI1ini/xvaXQh4eInUWWCgfLOzLUf CYS7PTAKx3oJR7WRIqMv5qYp2JHGGUWMv289ylAf35zxEaHzNaRSdwR+6vA+SAMde+3X /wZky4zLi2dnGQYzOTOAyHwyBsGqRjGso9eAq+TYamzYTjdsmOmIt0u9A4rZcMxm0X7F zVOIGQQp+1hZNgUVoLAoqM7HumBcgJf1mkZxNOMG1n4ikVRdengAZyD7XQdWlOzBZo6w xx/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mRVxFeKwO2yQVeWWSmY4F6S7iCswUPL+K2vMACvvH9x+TUP/e UycMkGsRn86Uit9OzaQgBI5/onDLJ5ac9Oqmj3GORkPS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLnWunMBhV6501FtI9PL1NE69oCj4siFKebvHMxwEl8oXe/jJ9HG2OENQdx9DLUmo+0xEFHlA8W5NRGBckCkU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:33a:: with SMTP id d26mr6452957vko.30.1591372762668; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <586edaef61b64a549929ccf974029cfd@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <586edaef61b64a549929ccf974029cfd@att.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:59:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTk=V9Gso7A5sraXC8nvSoGAmv6mGSpP7bMUrdi1Lznzj+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000039639705a758583b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/TbCSr25NhRX9c3O2Fko4I5ywW3I>
Subject: Re: [homenet] lack of discussion
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 15:59:27 -0000

I think that is reasonable not to have a session at the IETF108.  Following
the discussion during IETF 107, we discussed the use of OAUTH to enhance
automation and send a request to the OAUTH WG [1]. From the responses, we
should be able to provide what I think a final version for next IETF -
which does not represent a major change from where there are.

Yours,
Daniel

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/hXenXDwtbMIVuBFZZI5rA2ykGAU/

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 10:36 AM STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

> Hi homenet,
> While Michael and Daniel put some effort into their draft prior to IETF
> 107, there's been no subsequent discussion of it on the list. And no new
> activity on the draft.
> In the absence of activity, Stephen and I don't think homenet should
> request time during IETF 108.
>
> It may be time to close homenet and move the draft elsewhere (like maybe
> INT area).
>
> If you disagree, this is best expressed this through technical discussion
> and activities.
> Thx,
> Barbara
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email