Re: [homenet] The minimal Babel profile for Homenet

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sat, 31 October 2015 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6DC1A8709 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EUIqWRmwOTZG for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2901A8704 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wmff134 with SMTP id f134so31433747wmf.0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1FNAok+0Bhfy+BX7TQpqtBaIm3hSlgfwCHbRyHwSYCM=; b=infal3j99hXAgmXsOcNlu+LKR+mxmXqlIgZkvBm1rHFISV2a3oKKLXhTZjE1V017Q2 N3FZTUza6+GFIq2ScNODHMNyY8KDF0nXW+RWDQUMncvSvgMwNDOLMIFGG2WTN1CyoOUe agJlpMrhOWBXHgypcQLvaiZjK2bGSf1Cf7++yFSmQPF2gbhikL70ByuCKMA/UaZ7G3jM XcdNqx76f9zAhJZnRhmwN65h/9QLeDQb96dHFavsGu1FniQsPmnh8fxpCVHi+OvBgqSq 5ERCR7zjoP/FfijWzRJyR2tLS9sYJqhdYYhGxVmwrVOnFJyNKgFQeioWQxaUOhN4ubx9 nGXQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.5.208 with SMTP id 199mr4070471wmf.40.1446308179271; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.8.104 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <15930.1446236730@sandelman.ca>
References: <87d1vzw5q4.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611424E4546@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <12832.1446046999@sandelman.ca> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611424E4FCD@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <15930.1446236730@sandelman.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:16:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQ99k4aUeKaeU9unSVo6870AwCM4YBE4Jwk0CTvoQLC6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144214242e937052368dd4c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/TfmeleWt799mjCsHXQxqUusXRPI>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] The minimal Babel profile for Homenet
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:16:22 -0000

On Friday, October 30, 2015, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>     >> SHOULD is actually pretty strong.  It doesn't mean, "implement if
> you
>     >> like" (that's MAY).  It means, implement it, unless you have a
> serious
>     >> reason why you can't.
>     >>
>     >> For instance, an IPv6 only IoT gateway probably has no interest in
>     >> IPv4 if it can get IPv6.  MUST would make that gateway
> non-compliant.
>
>     > Maybe conditionally mandatory? If the router can be used for routing
>
> That's what SHOULD is *for*
> If you are concerned it won't get implemented, then any weasel room you
> leave
> will be exploited.  At that point, the market gets to decide.
>
>
>
Agreed on SHOULD

MUST unduly enshrines IPv4 and ... NAT


> --
> Michael Richardson
> -on the road-
>
>
>