IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC0A1A0059 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cThWCwJ5Gneo for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BED81A0056 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a141so98450oig.34 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s9VJxRaxBkfZOrOGvjCM6deix+2rYluptYd4JUDXnV4=; b=oevudq+JERPAYAkq++9dSQ/fj2YKJ/nNAc0ywRKiCGxsYmKuYqN6LSNZVZmzb9t8pI /s8AeWRW6X4+oQDGPSX6kaRHHhRV7HqWaQL4KF5gmCKe/ho34OUxU98wPP9C7trSm+v7 Kd6OAO2/3PfsP8t5p2Ian+3HpvTT42u6V2Ii/fC1H+TSbNaiKNh6DXHbOa6TzeSu5Olr f6DiNfRRHZiyYA4x7cHISnvg5E1dR22A7gmycbcpJGHktEVcc5aYTL/14Q7KBfIb1Bh9 VBNt+yhzH2ItNZE0qszjX75L2+I75NlmD9iFu3vMfd88ZYN/th2jk49syKYYU9aFTJu2 0KUQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.126.233 with SMTP id nb9mr4972484obb.48.1413330050779; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.227.211 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADhXe50DoZjjoG5tfidcGgtXx1TFyYECZyzeWmQstsT3=HPyaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410141020360.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <C52D3324-3015-45E0-88CF-D2A778D246B8@iki.fi> <CADhXe52iH_Abh3iZvpgQQYJF_FzbKkhNwzwjkcDt-DJA3RL+VA@mail.gmail.com> <70C2B2B2-A19A-4730-AB51-1EF26448445B@fugue.com> <CADhXe533umX9Q3NSbEktjcj8mBatXkDmRQKz0hOkGriBSX0t4g@mail.gmail.com> <94990F79-439A-4820-B03B-BFEAB01AA515@fugue.com> <CADhXe50DoZjjoG5tfidcGgtXx1TFyYECZyzeWmQstsT3=HPyaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:40:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4qbzcv5zn-9gG=1dzBW6R2bOeHRnKOpCUCwdDdW6BY+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/UO3nQs7tgETP2-SbfqMqymIcOkk
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:40:52 -0000

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:40 PM, James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> When we talked about this previously, I think the idea was that when two
>> networks with two sets of ULA prefixes merge, you deprecate one of them.
>> [...]
>
>
> Naturally, you deprecate one of them, but my concern is that they never
> expire if the objective is for a ULA prefix to be invariant. So how many
> times can a network join with others before it runs out of space for
> deprecated and redundant but unexpired and invariant ULA prefixes?
>

2^56 times I think...

... but the network itself would expire long before then. :)

What's a more reasonable bound? What's the bound before a given
network would collapse from multicast joins alone?
> --
> james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
> Nest Labs, Communications Engineering
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>



-- 
Dave Täht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email