IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] naming drafts

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 09 June 2021 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2E43A078C for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xX5WpfjJ1shI for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5AE3A0778 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1101738C32 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:39:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mIg9CAUTU733 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B73938C30 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A161B486 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:38:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkkaFjPirsgWn_0AZ=hL7EAJOfHnhOP_1P7CnkbXuK-1nw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DM6PR02MB692445CDCA3FD587D20404A2C33B9@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <17049.1622918776@localhost> <adb9ff4e-31a9-cb41-7e9b-6fb5c2dfa137@cs.tcd.ie> <aabb3050-e5cf-159c-0030-374cf79088e5@globis.net> <b7d4b03e-0b5b-3bcc-1d0d-fa772e6aaaaf@cs.tcd.ie> <CADZyTkkWFj8Ot1SmhNontpQmWO0ue6Zfi7dN4XVfLrSyGYyUJQ@mail.gmail.com> <fa57e2ed-957a-90f8-5a5c-108ea7e4eee7@cs.tcd.ie> <CADZyTkkaFjPirsgWn_0AZ=hL7EAJOfHnhOP_1P7CnkbXuK-1nw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 20:38:38 -0400
Message-ID: <6259.1623199118@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/UvjlEjaSAynSFiK_iQycT0MwZLM>
Subject: Re: [homenet] naming drafts
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:38:52 -0000

    sf> Sure, and as I said I'm not opposed to that. I suspect the
    sf> best thing is for the authors to chat with our AD and see
    sf> if he's either willing to AD-sponsor it, or to ask another
    sf> WG to adopt, or try find a dispatch-like process to see if
    sf> enough interest/review can be found that way.

It's the WG's document, and the WG can abandon it if it likes.
That would require some consensus seeking discussing.

If it turns out the WG isn't interested in the document, I sure wish that the
WG had said so a year ago though.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email