Re: [homenet] Montreal homenet activities

Sávyo Vinícius <> Wed, 05 June 2019 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112541200C1 for <>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 08:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.018
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WT6OASGJcthE for <>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 08:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D67E1200B4 for <>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 08:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id v19so2832130wmj.5 for <>; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 08:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=adulx+9VdHUTO6Dt5MH3CP2kEbW5eGu+7aDlY0cNgKg=; b=g/V5sIslVZ3YOIqadDf5I0gYrVzqW/jo1D2x+hGWA4azBW2AAFuwDj9JrMbyK/0k23 6y8JVrKKwFB+whWPngiY+N20wGkt6JRNX8EcPDFhKmEILxnISkY5Fi3r94v4pxVzdy2Z 5UEVoPjwhJ0PybsP3mYEAql7Akp/l1CuJFIFunU7wsUqCi+NXQo0uPdNPILHp72WfZtM rbcH2cdmTXcFCOkqlDQCg8OWRNDjdidSCJzWzMJX7+Areg5C1gyZAkMj5Ssn/onNn0lg RyaYPCmy3XwXyQ1AATP0ugO4N3z6XKjIOivJL/tRkKfCyxpe0j2dNnZxTm563aAb1XMt B+Ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=adulx+9VdHUTO6Dt5MH3CP2kEbW5eGu+7aDlY0cNgKg=; b=h9chirwhlrLKx4Xsv1h6jOxAvW00m23wHy60vlnUfC1/t5PEbewgvLd0IOst8UV/4E FtpUNB+iQF91UsrfW8m7oFSLeVSX1zJlDzZ0J6nQm+uMhsAg/DuZwEDxy0nfwaWcqNX/ k0aFi01T30Ant4xfxlCl/YxOMQBfTBSAvJuuVkZf+MtxhGVKf7vHMgBAdV+R9Hb8hl+f yNXdnloPMtX6osWwzTVc3ogYFNFqiotXZSzZ9oxahXU3Ye5UVbvfQzEw6mEPRLkVuMms asly4EMLiA9W+KTQd11N7Bs9IX+0tySlEVappcIGxqpcMbSiUe115PFDhPmWwnOiI8Gm pu3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2aZHvK/n//j4ABZE5hBIpUA0+cADVys7BPzgsBc/LpASOUryp 1EoqRuWJjIlO79+RnK7QbcRzjm+IpkhblKf0njM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxf/kY1W8azpLLMmzp66L7BpdA+1iGrikObZtnbc9G5jhTZdKjx6dUolqZetVn8H9b/TmpOXFd6TlPiuELa/o0=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6c08:: with SMTP id h8mr16302622wmc.62.1559750169776; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 08:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: =?UTF-8?B?U8OhdnlvIFZpbsOtY2l1cw==?= <>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:55:58 -0300
Message-ID: <>
To: Ted Lemon <>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <>, homenet <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ced716058a95a2b5"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Montreal homenet activities
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 15:56:14 -0000

Hello homenet. It's sad to me read this when I'm just starting to follow
the group, and when my research is starting over IoT security in SOHO
networks. Is there some documentation about the current work in progress of
the group? Or some list of objectives for homenet to we start working over

BTW, I hope that we will can keep with the WG and keep doing great jobs

Em ter, 4 de jun de 2019 às 16:04, Ted Lemon <> escreveu:

> On Jun 4, 2019, at 2:26 PM, STARK, BARBARA H <> wrote:
> We encourage people wanting to work on homenet code to self-organize for
> the hackathon. I'll be happy to bring some OpenWRT devices to test with
> (and do some testing), if that would be useful. Let me know ...
> If people would like to set a time to have an "unstructured" get-together
> in Montreal, please let us know. There will be spaces available that can be
> reserved. We can figure out a time and sign up for such a space. I'm also
> happy to have a WebEx up and running for anyone who would want to join in
> remotely to such a get-together.
> I think these are both great ideas.   It’s been frustrating to me this
> year working with homenet, because I am actually working full-time on
> homenet technology, but there doesn’t seem to be the kind of interest in
> the IETF that would result in standardization.  E.g., some of the work I’ve
> been doing to get name service going on homenets in the dnssd working group
> failed last call because nobody responded.   Code is written, documents are
> up to date, but with no review and no interest, the only alternative is to
> send this stuff to the ISE.
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list