IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Mon, 30 November 2015 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A09C1A017D for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:39:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70jh4A0_J_dO for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1611A0158 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by oixx65 with SMTP id x65so93828597oix.0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:39:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=h4wq99fWTfOkH+QiYYYe6rq2g6C0NChWHUk22IONLvk=; b=0f0YYCezJnX8JPx4D7QwpD1IF54fbd23rNElg8LwD7cDpfAdN7w5n9DJrkwEO6Y+Dr fdW9w6nTn4wCUova86rx4aPy0rPkZ3iChGeCIRrYa9aNfGM14/tzfVbRsWhFgoTNL4Fy wN3bYSfIKV8qGpzQkVq2Mdg4Cr9jsr7tGJ2DsDwB1/GmuH1YENyyoEobkJBUrdZmTOpE 2OQ23Bajsg4nU0NaQd0sPB5a8/WHE20b92JpJJFy22zThGIACK/4E3sLIcMNFAOua/sf ax0EeSBGfwIojwFl40jEhPI+Yh7JNHyL49WYpHWVuJd5lpYfn5nzXall97FTqkIv//kh +IeA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.64.198 with SMTP id n189mr42518605oia.139.1448887145420; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:39:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.187.3 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:39:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <565C4168.6060700@openwrt.org>
References: <20151016113242.29159.37112.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5620E158.4000309@openwrt.org> <56265237.8020202@gmail.com> <56571260.6040504@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511261610310.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5658D282.1040006@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511300831000.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <565C3AF9.9070902@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511301321410.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <565C4168.6060700@openwrt.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:39:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6CcAUVgJX4XdkjtbxdB16B=c23quLDKQpbyoKDBgSHfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Vu0_lSj-kQoia6C5YdQ2_DMK9ko>
Cc: "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:39:07 -0000

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 30.11.2015 13:24, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> You still have to sync all information between all HNCP speakers anyway
>> in order to facilitate fast handover, both for /128 and /64 solution.
>
> That's not correct. If you read the draft, in the /128 case there is no
> need for this information to be published using HNCP. You would only
> publish which routers take part in the roaming.

I generally speak as someone that has been deploying 128s for about 7?
years now.

However, my hosts participate in the roaming via babel. I realize that
a long held homenet mantra is "no hosts changes", but it isn't mine.
We can do a lot if we improve the endpoints.

> Now, while I mostly agree that the /64 would make certain things easier,
> it is not really a feasible solution unless we can ensure, that all ISPs
> delegate _at least_ a /56.
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email