IETF Logo Mail Archive

[homenet] Back to Ted's draft [was: Firewall hole punching]

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Wed, 23 November 2016 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE72D129AFF for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:41:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHy6e9PS9w3G for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:41:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2BC5129B39 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/56228) with ESMTP id uANJfAu2015820; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:41:10 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA56D7AD0; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:41:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id h_bxonOl5RVD; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:41:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lanthane.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (unknown [172.23.36.54]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54C1AD7ACE; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:41:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lanthane.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr) by lanthane.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <jch@irif.fr>) id 1c9dPo-00006s-42; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:41:08 +0100
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:41:08 +0100
Message-ID: <7i4m2ynfvv.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC037817-F1F6-46E1-AC07-6C3D787C494F@google.com>
References: <871syc54d1.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1=eXRBh6UqGGqUSK9cH_jY5MvPcE4MFZUPe2Z48LF7bkA@mail.gmail.com> <87lgwj504t.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAPt1N1kDCMDBEpt7QYhHtPYjaMJAzw8G81=2y2f=y0ZProeCPA@mail.gmail.com> <13675.1479346312@dooku.sandelman.ca> <3B35AF68-4792-4B2A-8277-A7B49206581F@google.com> <74143607-B81E-4D4C-89D3-4754E0DA7DE1@jisc.ac.uk> <790beb67-a62e-b7dc-b64e-a3fcecfbdb12@mtcc.com> <87zikrihl7.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2EEB3CCD-3C25-4844-95B5-DDE31F982EA2@iki.fi> <87oa17i9eq.wl-jch@irif.fr> <AC037817-F1F6-46E1-AC07-6C3D787C494F@google.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:41:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5835F0D6.006 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5835F0D6.006 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5835F0D6.006 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/WSghdbFK9w2XKqFY7r17TCeEf5E>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: [homenet] Back to Ted's draft [was: Firewall hole punching]
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:41:16 -0000

> it doesn’t make sense to me why we should spend our time specifying
> protocols for registering names of services in the global domain name
> system unless we have a realistic usage scenario that shows how they
> will be reachable directly by arbitrary public hosts.

Agreed.

> I just don’t see how there is any such realistic scenario. Hence, I’m
> not sold that adopting this draft is a good idea.

I believe that Ted has now clarified that the next version of his draft
will focus solely on naming within the home.  Perhaps I'm optimistic, but
it looks to me like we're slowly converging towards consensus on doing
naming in the home only and ignoring the issues of naming in the Global
Internet.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email