IETF Logo Mail Archive

[homenet] ISPs using DHCP for individual clients

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 November 2020 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2883A1A8A for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:37:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAcHctCQKA-4 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:37:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x935.google.com (mail-ua1-x935.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::935]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D774A3A1A88 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:37:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x935.google.com with SMTP id a10so2864560uan.12 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:37:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TiQy2NC6x5X2MJAYhaLFWg0JSXJmEPQYvYVDz/3gJf0=; b=ILri8MXpDidj6goic7Qgk0RTJTfU/FwahEC612107TdX+i++qNBXXfq1IdMBjWl7aa 32XPOpBqilGqPfr8/owCE+MUmL0ocFA+wFcM8G35kmRUFGwBHE2FSBLMBYApjih57q5g QIIiAL2TF+Ts2O0g9gUxRjybJCYzVaQYlUSD9ISh2ifQiXPbEm2wkpu553mtqLeJqRs4 IF0wEL93QTL+Tf7Fvp1aW9dWoSN2iqQrRRsyE/vJMplAwfe3attgwFw1V7jMtyCpSrPH sWxw8iw+dEcwP8NAT7tEcqXHsDHZubdGdhSWHZ8o2M8e+Te3D5U4zvq35s/RJZgNC6Yn tBog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TiQy2NC6x5X2MJAYhaLFWg0JSXJmEPQYvYVDz/3gJf0=; b=TW6iFetMgcLsW6rLls77U6Cria5tNoPqwAPIgNhK3kN+wS9uldab6B9XlMMxdX5W4g +a+ypxUJKpIWjsmoKnQGhbM0L1G5MMkw44KN0/TRLy4EuO8jctlzJLVVaSvL+FE0p6I3 mQdNqfXuk0ZLvqr9d9850PZvW+HhDpScewQlinbJseaI0ZKrjUrRn5XsWkiXf42D2NKn iUddP6sf/5w8ZM9ozCIfViwuGwRJVOul+Eh10gdKTWYOhMtRyWCJfM/JBCUnLaAvKiM7 hz/q7p1SCEyb9iUwIraA+94snp4EwxtHvWz80kHxS8JH+byqrmCuxS8aCGjQatu4CRTa dTzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rAGDuJw+wX80GbQeSqJUqULIMVFAkwuCMdF27EbbPsDqu0i/O g9qkltW/mV+KyegvAW+efBAjPa1zKRXyJLEY/mJU40ri
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynPH3RVjP/EA+rsbG5i8IQfpTM7SDG8HRe1S8UuwZBB9SwORArU+YS2uv+DjyfmBRkKR6ruKudD1LMszXHnv0=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:1606:: with SMTP id k6mr11292615uae.80.1605861461372; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:37:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:37:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CADZyTkn5nFDwNZev1ggj2do7uLcr=M9EKT8mmaiFPXhPaObBwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: homenet <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f6b35605b485c1a4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/XRmLpscSVejQMQBEDUVV6RDquDE>
Subject: [homenet] ISPs using DHCP for individual clients
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:37:44 -0000

Hi,

While designing the DHCP options to configure the HNA we asked ourselves
how likely ISP are:

A) How an ISP is likely to perform an action that is user specific based on
a DHCP request. In our case the HNA sends to the DHCP server the
certificate it will use to authenticate itself to a server the ISP has
control on. The action is that the ISP will need to provision the server
with that certificate.

B) How an ISP is likely to provide a DHCP response that is specific to an
individual user. The specific information is typically expected to be
something provisioned for that user.

Yours,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email