IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?

Tim Coote <tim+ietf.org@coote.org> Fri, 22 April 2016 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tim+ietf.org@coote.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6AF12D8C3 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mqQP6GtDy1Al for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 07:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.coote.org (mail.coote.org [IPv6:2001:470:698f:0:21e:c9ff:fe31:92ce]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1465E12D5D2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 07:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.coote.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37D9B16C129F; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:55:00 +0100 (BST)
X-Original-To: homenet@ietf.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mercury.coote.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7396A16C1001; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:54:59 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Tim Coote <tim+ietf.org@coote.org>
In-Reply-To: <7F4438B6-8074-49D5-AB52-C4AEB3A2E0B0@pp.inet.fi>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:54:59 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B15E803D-A7FF-4F5A-ADA8-EB92CBC88A67@coote.org>
References: <6E709688-414A-4AFB-AEAE-56BAE0469583@coote.org> <7F4438B6-8074-49D5-AB52-C4AEB3A2E0B0@pp.inet.fi>
To: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@pp.inet.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.00
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/YLcWEhlK1k3lkrqcSx2anZJqTDE>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:55:03 -0000

> On 21 Apr 2016, at 18:32, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@pp.inet.fi> wrote:
> 
> While we have tested all hnetd versions on Debian stable as well, I cannot recommend it as there is no configuration or real integration with the system beyond "edit/create shell scripts". 
> 
> Obviously anything else automated on the associated interfaces has to be disabled as Juliusz noted. 
> 
> Disclaimer: I do not find Linux distribution integration fun so OpenWrt is enough for me. Of course I am for sale given enough money ;) ( consulting mainly on some other stuff at the moment though )
> 
> -Markus
Thanks, Markus. That’s what I’d concluded. I didn’t want to try to unpick the openwrt tools and integrate with larger distros tools, which sort of knocks on the head Tore’s suggestion of using namespaces as I’d still have the porting problem. Building a separate vm for openwrt seems like some complexity that I could do without at the moment, too, although I can see value in separating the network configuration from the application configuration.

I’ll start with Juliusz’ suggestion.

tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email