IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?

Tim Coote <tim+ietf.org@coote.org> Sat, 23 April 2016 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tim+ietf.org@coote.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F268712DAF8 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 06:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ek2I0NtSMnV5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 06:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.coote.org (575185b4.skybroadband.com [87.81.133.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE9E12DAF6 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 06:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.coote.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC57916C129F; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:31:18 +0100 (BST)
X-Original-To: homenet@ietf.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mercury.coote.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4260316C1147; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:31:18 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Tim Coote <tim+ietf.org@coote.org>
In-Reply-To: <87lh47vtpe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:31:18 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02CF43FB-CF81-4C0C-84E1-A8DFB27B3F8C@coote.org>
References: <6E709688-414A-4AFB-AEAE-56BAE0469583@coote.org> <87oa93vz8e.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <917CFE11-2386-4B0D-8A81-F87764AC09A4@coote.org> <87lh47vtpe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.00
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/YshHKX1umCI8KB_zJM51lFUpB_k>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:31:26 -0000

> On 21 Apr 2016, at 16:59, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
> 
> Tim, please try shncpd and let me know how it goes.  I'm quite willing to
> add features, but I'm waiting for a user community to emerge so I know
> what features people actually care about.
> 
> — Juliusz

Ok. I’m starting by running shncpd on a boundary router and tried a trivial installation. I can see that RAs are generated and picked up as expected. (when I remembered to turn off the various radvd instances...

I don’t see how dns gets updated. Are such updates out of scope of shncpd? Are they in scope for the other homenet protocols?

tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email