IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-15.txt

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 26 May 2021 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBAE3A0CF0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vRd2VsKLBwH for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1AB53A0CEB for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id v4so1440716qtp.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BJZLmUjKlyX4+loCrfmzmcMIP4uqnCOKC2st068CaHo=; b=JqrAOZ4TJlUGr2VyGBLG9L+CUoIg18NiLsR/wRGO8siViDxVRm/xYcp5vQ/TBu5vno 8Lsp7hVNwCpgarnNGFRKECoaP8RTNh2bjxaWloFcEqWRYjFUj5PBbl+oXpCaCId7Q6L0 HMbWaqTWTCK7Al+Xdtj5UQ9B7bPNwd2OTfhJb69/lZn7V2ApBv3xeK1bShrtK0FRw5c2 X9mnzM3pEOeT35rJn2PK2cm7oZD0Zbvt+j+eOpfcoxZqjzw9zEP+LmQobEIhOfi3giwz MFd25X06i2dmaxJa//oHBcMH8ocDgeZN5n9gG/hOGvHM3pEucSiRRfY/ePmCwCy53krK unng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BJZLmUjKlyX4+loCrfmzmcMIP4uqnCOKC2st068CaHo=; b=BIgKdo00k+lGyPV7z0lN4UB3wndq1eh7oL2YMNBZPV/CU67KzjRBeMXWbbvulO3Ysd 9WHwc2C7GCb8NGRaOy/xcHFpW5s1N8xlfrd6s95z96n6XkDhH/SZB24S1QBq6gg2j2pl T2bz/JVqtJ2XHea9lLB4vjoWTchKgiNOStWS2+vlv9vC4R0JnHvhvdxu17yxFdqu8wl2 gqecWG2oMpZSAWnPzdYuOTxQGmroPx+ocr7nqloOPT+2KcXYbwDWgm4OUEhSxZNqNOHM g6buAM9joXoe+DdCUwXcGwth8DWIT5Tka/r8TA0uj6P1PMRklLDGBDKX15FQQaieV70H QiWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wqoAUIbn4TXYRLkJGjIhOynFxoM/kSkaQ6+dMMxrQ7HnX4Tzr Aq55wbnDUp+mzL+Yysbrs2gPOf50pFAG0IYS+dg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxS9ae4dF3x65L2cE7L80tacgbYbRmYl6EBeRJnkvaqU7lXSl2nDHUnwxhGf+djiVLQYH/8m1GVOWtECX+ttA8=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5250:: with SMTP id y16mr24374692qtn.36.1622049328275; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162092926151.12926.11178130729299739728@ietfa.amsl.com> <b6aaa622-bb36-9cb7-0e1a-b2cd40500cec@cs.tcd.ie> <87y2c3uho4.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87y2c3uho4.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 13:15:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkn-NR2dgef5yKbzQBVKpMDnA2Yhmjgnywr3s1LDg7BCsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, homenet <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005231b05c33ecadc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/ZusZdjLrICo9TW76NDGe3ChjJhM>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-15.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 17:15:35 -0000

Hi Juliusz,

I think we responded to the question in 2014 [1]. I am happy to clarify our
text of section 1.2. Could you please point out what in the draft you
believe is wrong and what you would like to be updated.

Yours,
Daniel

[1]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/qL5BmPs5LOi281AMTCD_lHt49Is/


On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:23 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:

> > #5 The arguments why this is better than DDNS don't convince
> > me, except for the last one (new RR types).  Given that DDNS is
> > deployed, what's the chances that this would also get traction?
>
> I think that's an important point.  I actually asked the very same
> question back in 2014:
>
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/CBoLV2St-kSW0vQNE4GtKqRQthA/
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/m3tmE8m1pt11YIB5yAtWUMFlv3c/
>
> The authors integrated the discussion as Section 1.2 of the draft, which
> is what you are referring to.  I'm not sure if I'm convinced by their
> arguments, I suspect that there's some unstated requirement that I don't
> undestand.
>
> -- Juliusz
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email