IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Wed, 22 October 2014 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1151ACEB6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Izlq-BQl8BHi for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (mail-vc0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE301ACE86 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hq12so2261051vcb.5 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5ySdrYVvyn/sSJXB1RNsyaMFPrB8qIhWesh3poJmMzA=; b=FHTZmIHAOex4OlJodAYMt2BnbbuREDSxLVnthLg4sUqyZVDqfdwc+p7y+Sion3N4GG pPiV/Amkebdomi2SItO2t5W+PV8Y/KvUPtjnbNiVhbzrOdUqFFtPYvHO3WQ4tYw07sAn zdOkGbkvAnOC9jf9EgsKnjsW/3Z7CL7027gNeIXcBkOykpqJyd0HhrJD1OzMG6+RVhZd KaS5PbFTXVFEoYfyDAAno4qgfgPmhQW3gKNwy/NEO6j8gLNpLWYHIvuOJ+LdDeg8UXDp M6D2ODF9BUn3tXXi9Nos2XV3c3tgK2QoNU+Gp9q4zhohlJ36tw5HCWeE2uj2qM45DVRg zNEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnf/J+bt9UTIO4gHzuyKDTdE2K2euzaF203a3F+2Xo3zkjWf7AklJimD7VNdEYx/odu8/W6
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.188.131 with SMTP id da3mr37555011vcb.10.1414000265574; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.10.65 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <648DEA84-6A8F-4075-85B1-AD135719CFC0@iki.fi>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410141020360.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <C52D3324-3015-45E0-88CF-D2A778D246B8@iki.fi> <CADhXe52iH_Abh3iZvpgQQYJF_FzbKkhNwzwjkcDt-DJA3RL+VA@mail.gmail.com> <70C2B2B2-A19A-4730-AB51-1EF26448445B@fugue.com> <CADhXe533umX9Q3NSbEktjcj8mBatXkDmRQKz0hOkGriBSX0t4g@mail.gmail.com> <94990F79-439A-4820-B03B-BFEAB01AA515@fugue.com> <CADhXe50DoZjjoG5tfidcGgtXx1TFyYECZyzeWmQstsT3=HPyaA@mail.gmail.com> <0DACB967-C77F-4C8A-82DD-759FF5C39E91@fugue.com> <CADhXe51ya1bHnP8NCvNkuN1+xdhNnA3qnapn7h1XEvmDX2D_jg@mail.gmail.com> <4321EF22-4AD9-4BC8-8253-12034C562C00@fugue.com> <CADhXe51MC4ubB3de+sSm+KSRNQJH7RLVvRUWmQnE393RR+HBnA@mail.gmail.com> <69F7C62F-273B-4808-B7A8-5D2487CAF4BF@fugue.com> <CADhXe52FW+7e8t9Z8fHGvHZfZJWM48gwnDBLhHz8TwZQzMGa4Q@mail.gmail.com> <9C02AF4F-CEFC-426A-B8CC-0A5DA146FB1B@fugue.com> <CBD056DD-D5CA-4B2E-878F-14BB0EF123FD@fugue.com> <CADhXe50Cg5nsjTBOpjJXxwububOgDo381QRPd3dyW=XfnqO1sw@mail.gmail.com> <1D269223-52B5-4B58-A46F-3B787EAFE4F3@fugue.com> <802A6061-3B41-4296-B739-E740DCF4873F@darou.fr> <648DEA84-6A8F-4075-85B1-AD135719CFC0@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CADhXe53drG2EzQmAvzGstcM-gC0UtjDOY3YQoKswRWYfqky-2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
To: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e015379928acd00050606978c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/ZzuIHbbxMy_jE9PiR8eSixvRggo
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:51:35 -0000

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
wrote:

>
> My assertion:
>
> Given HNCP generated one spans whole administrative domain, _and_ should
> not have routing anywhere outside it, it’s uniqueness does not _matter_.
>

Wait. Where did this "and should not be routable anywhere outside"
recommendation come from? And if it's only a recommendation and not a
requirement, then it still matters, right? I don't see that we can
meaningfully make it a requirement, and I would advise against attempting
to make it a recommendation. I don't believe such a recommendation will be
followed.


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email