Re: [homenet] Which IP addresses must be avoided?

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 17 May 2016 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3956A12DDC5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t5XD6KtQQRUk for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D7E12DDBC for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.211] (mul.isi.edu [128.9.160.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4HKavDH008427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 May 2016 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>, "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu>
References: <87wpms8zvo.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <573B4076.304@kit.edu> <87eg908mrs.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <512f684a-58ad-dcca-dd7f-c79006aa7f73@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:36:57 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87eg908mrs.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/_XG6sSxSTkxx8EJGi001CChw2Hk>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Which IP addresses must be avoided?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 20:37:22 -0000


On 5/17/2016 1:14 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5453
>> provides an answer w.r.t. IPv6.
> 
> Do I need to avoid these addresses when assigning a /128 or a /127?

Yes - these are reserved IDs. You need to avoid any IPv6 address that
would be the result of using these values as the ID portion.

Joe