Re: [homenet] New draft : draft-bonnetain-hncp-security

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 04 July 2014 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10B81B28BA for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 05:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eFroUH9BdBJi for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 05:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E301B28DF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 05:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 518B1A1; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:45:59 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1404477959; bh=Ganyb86ZO3G+UOH0Yzg/C23/ejD9sJ61F3b8USa6NTM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=2ZDAssSXu5QwkGJDq5ONVp91XU48pooZxzg+SBmXsrcIMA0YhMF0jhTnJIg1bS9od rLERbY75tiM+kc8G6tLK9poZ1+mH70cPi5LY+/ewescX9tDQ8VpxkNbz/Spn3Ek/lr pvkXCQdQxtAvU1z8ZuX9P6nzhG2Cb/jDlFFibzFs=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4874E9F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:45:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:45:59 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: homenet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPqzxca6jqRuD1-c9yD7WEqj6LAnDDgV5_NV+YkF=+xBFZH-Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407041443100.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAPqzxca6jqRuD1-c9yD7WEqj6LAnDDgV5_NV+YkF=+xBFZH-Gw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/_dDy_lUcZYPD0fMOZ4mxMrjJXM4
Subject: Re: [homenet] New draft : draft-bonnetain-hncp-security
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:46:03 -0000

On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Bonnetain wrote:

> What do you think of it ?

I am not good enough in this area to validate that the draft actually does 
the right things from a security context, but it looks like we in the 
homenet WG are getting very close to what they're doing in the "Autonomic 
Networking Integrated Model and Approach" ANIMA

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/current/msg03639.html

I think we need to decide how to relate to their work, ignore it, try to 
steer both work efforts so we have some communality, or split up the work 
(or something else).

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se