Re: [homenet] support for HNCP in IPv6 CE routers

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 26 October 2017 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55CB13F448 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nzJwsHIGVynT for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFADA13F5EF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: homenet@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCAD40BA2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115AF40B9E; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 036C86B998; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:39:52 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20171026183952.GI45648@Space.Net>
References: <80D10C70-9411-48EE-8189-87E9401D7F22@consulintel.es> <FFB4541F-0BDB-4D5F-B6BB-647EFD0FE27E@google.com> <20171024140034.GS45648@Space.Net> <7iwp3i3pev.wl-jch@irif.fr> <63640f24-f178-2fe7-7c1f-e2680496b733@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <63640f24-f178-2fe7-7c1f-e2680496b733@google.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/aQIXRaB3LBqcf4a6aJrANoq8184>
Subject: Re: [homenet] support for HNCP in IPv6 CE routers
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:39:58 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:32:44AM -0700, james woodyatt wrote:
> Accordingly, I strongly recommend that HOMENET dispense with the "My 
> Friendly ISP" model with extreme prejudice, and adopt what I shall call 
> the "HOMENET Castle Doctrine" as a matter of working group policy.

I claim that this is a sure way to kill homenet from being ever deployed.

"Normal" People just don't buy a second router for their ISP link if they
already have one, or a 3rd and 4th one if they happen to have two ISP
links.

So, what do we think a future home network for normal people is going to
look like?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279