Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 14 October 2014 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6472B1A8791 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.692
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.692 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QKJsUXhBFthL for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F261A8890 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: homenet@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA2A6079A for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:27:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C6F6012B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:27:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 12606 invoked by uid 1007); 14 Oct 2014 16:27:46 +0200
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:27:46 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-ID: <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/b19IK3zkkQwbG22eu-zZvy2FD8w
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:27:55 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:44:03AM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote:
> This is something we discussed at length back when we were doing
> the architecture document.   The problem with this approach is that
> it exposes you to flash renumbering when you get back online, or
> if you can't do flash renumbering, you could easily find yourself
> without connectivity because you are using the wrong source address.

"flash renumber is a problem" is pretty much a non-argument, as flash 
renumbering *will* happen, and devices in the home *will* have to handle it.

Carriers do it today - "here's a new /56, have fun", without even having
to reconnect.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279