Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 17 June 2016 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A5D12D5AB for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZaWiR4zFC3Ym for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9928D12D52B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E51E2009E; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:47:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E348638BF; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:39:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=7NAgfw=ZDX-S+Tc6RbYDMbuyUD-KXUwiLUyuDdEoF+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <76ed7404-35ff-9cc8-262b-d5785595465c@isc.org> <4598.1466104881@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <87porgafsq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <102a01d1c82a$f1e1e530$d5a5af90$@registry.asia> <7526.1466169795@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAPt1N1=7NAgfw=ZDX-S+Tc6RbYDMbuyUD-KXUwiLUyuDdEoF+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:39:32 -0400
Message-ID: <11120.1466170772@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/cMoiGVKQPJWJ14LdDKExOQwmvP4>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>, Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia>
Subject: Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:39:35 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
    > Michael, the reason to have a consistent name is that the name _will_
    > show up in UI elements, and therefore _should_ behave in a
    > comprehensible manner. The IETF tends to be understandably dismissive
    > of the end-user's capacity to correctly model the functioning of the
    > network, but we should not use techniques that deliberately subvert the
    > user's ability to make models.

I violently agree, but you seem to be saying I missed this.

Perhaps you can explain to me what it is that you think I'm suggesting?

That's also why I think that it should be possible for the underlying name to
be in the native language.






--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-