[homenet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-10: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 04 December 2015 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7B81A89BB; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:51:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151204165147.5335.55921.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:51:47 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/cTd8Lyw93kaCVTLaYro-aDRJKcA>
Cc: homenet-chairs@ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org, mark@townsley.net, draft-ietf-homenet-hncp@ietf.org
Subject: [homenet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:51:47 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-hncp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my discuss about the options for using DTLS. Sorry for being slow with this ballot update. The comments below are old, I didn't check if you've made related changes. Happy to chat about that if you want, (or not if you prefer not:-) - I agree with Kathleen's discuss that the implementation requirements for DTLS need to be clarified, hopefully (from my POV) to make that MTI but I'll leave that discussion to the other thread. -Section 9: You should refer to HKDF and not HMAC-SHA256 though the reference to RFC 6234 is still right. HMAC-SHA256 itself is not a key derivation function, which is what you want here. - Please take a look at the secdir review [1] and respond to that as it raises one issue not (I think) otherwise mentioned. What is the effect (on a home) of one compromised hncp router? Perhaps you'll say that's obvious, or perhaps not, but I'm interested in what you do say, in case it's not obvious:-) [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06098.html
- [homenet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [homenet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on d… Markus Stenberg
- Re: [homenet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on d… Stephen Farrell