IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 07 October 2019 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944831200CD; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 05:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYWdJuMG7OWL; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 05:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7B8120099; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 05:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [80.233.45.41]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E870F1F483; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 12:35:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id EE8F927F1; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:49:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <homenet@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <CAO42Z2yOdxkfMWJEBWK-J=UWPQ5CyPJ3j0b+HarwXWV4GkK87g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <56255ECF-9002-4440-BA0D-665EFC4BA9C6@fugue.com> <F638F635-9A1C-409E-BDB8-C00DF00A64C8@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1910040752050.968@uplift.swm.pp.se> <A52F076F-817D-4807-8CD6-280C2040AEBF@employees.org> <5F0D2E3D-BE20-4421-8A37-E81E6B93B3A5@fugue.com> <E50D25C7-8EF1-4685-9442-021F019F7F62@employees.org> <60B2C15B-E126-4F86-AA9A-9EB9A6C0EB2D@fugue.com> <FBCD2C32-9CBE-4499-A3E9-0FF4991E34DF@employees.org> <A5D12082-3D6A-4540-9AFB-2530D4FA6A32@fugue.com> <CAO42Z2yOdxkfMWJEBWK-J=UWPQ5CyPJ3j0b+HarwXWV4GkK87g@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> message dated "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 09:34:14 +1100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:49:15 +0200
Message-ID: <28610.1570441755@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/caEefIAy2nNRLf1YXAEyVAV5B6E>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 12:35:21 -0000

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Perhaps ANIMA is an alternative? It has seemed to me that home networks
    > might be just a more specific case of autonomic networks.

    > For example, they've been defining a Generic Autonomic Signalling
    > Protocol (GRASP).

GRASP has some overlap with HNCP, but HNCP isn't really the issue.
Homenet has a routing protocol (BABEL).  It was going to be OSPFv3, and we'd
add the information flooding that HNCP wound up doing into OSPFv3, but that
"didn't work" and the WG (mysteriously) abandonned that idea.

ANIMA's GRASP is also not a routing protocol: ANIMA builds an overlap control
layer with IP over IPsec over IPv6LL tunnels, and runs RPL (RFC6550) as
the routing protocol for the control plane.  While the resulting ACP shares
some properties with the desired HOMENET routing goals, it's not the same
thing at all.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email