Re: [homenet] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Thu, 29 October 2015 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3524A1A8A08; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wLj8mD4eDf-7; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A7F91A87B3; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/56228) with ESMTP id t9TDlRYX000984; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:47:27 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06CB61FA5; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:47:27 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id CvH1LyrOh_zf; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:47:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from trurl.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (col75-1-78-194-40-74.fbxo.proxad.net [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F89661FA1; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:47:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:47:23 +0100
Message-ID: <87h9l9kcr8.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>
In-Reply-To: <5627A38C.7040405@openwrt.org>
References: <20151020204159.17294.93467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56279391.5050207@openwrt.org> <56279D4C.5050600@cisco.com> <5627A38C.7040405@openwrt.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:47:28 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5632236F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5632236F.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5632236F.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/cpEK4VfYd0zlDHSCYPr7XTBrNAo>
Cc: homenet-chairs@ietf.org, mark@townsley.net, victor@jvknet.com, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp@ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:47:35 -0000

> No, that is not true. The applicability section also mentions e.g.:

[...]

> I'm not sure what other points could be added,

Since every change in the set of neighbours of a node causes reflooding,
DNCP is not suitable in environments where high levels of node mobility
are expected?

-- Juliusz