Re: [homenet] security work items - what do we want to do?

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 24/01/18 02:48, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]> wrote:
>     > - Does this sound roughly right or off the wall?
> 
> It sounds right.
> I think that bootstrap of security should become an recharter item in the
> future.  Some kind of BCP on interactions with MUD, SUIT, etc. IN THE
> FUTURE. NOT NOW.

Can you say more? Eg. what would be needed before you think
it'd be sensible for homenet to start work in this space?

> 
>     > 2. We have this milestone in our charter:
> 
>     > "Nov 2018 - Submission of the perimeter security draft
>     > to the IESG as Informational RFC"
> 
> Yes.  Are the authors still engaged?

I'm not aware that we have authors;-( I guess someone could have
volunteered in the past before I was helping out as chair (if so,
please do let us know).

Cheers,
S.

> I think I've missed the last three homenet WG sessions due to conflicts.
> I find that the ML is too frequently ratholed when it isn't silent.
> 
>     > - Does the homenet wg need to profile use of those
>     > security mechanisms, for example to document a way to
>     > establish initial keying material that we'd like to see
>     > implemented when those protocols are used in home networks?
> 
>     > - If so, (and without yet getting into discussions about ToFU
>     > etc) do we have people who are interested in working on
>     > that?
> 
> Yes, but not yet.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 

-- 
PGP key change time for me.
New-ID 7B172BEA; old-ID 805F8DA2 expires Jan 24 2018.
NewWithOld sigs in keyservers.
Sorry if that mucks something up;-)