Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940C41B38C9; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:17:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yr8OcGl1KDE1; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:17:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fugue.com (mail-2.fugue.com [IPv6:2a01:7e01::f03c:91ff:fee4:ad68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FD31B38C5; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:17:30 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----sinikael-?=_1-14478634466750.7361913619097322"
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
To: homenet@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvup0qqmHy0Bwe1hCWGDKPYmG602kC1HJ_T-89Ef=uPMdQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151117235034.24927.22561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <564C8923.5060705@openwrt.org> <1447861588613-80e36dd7-a4018a10-e1e3de86@fugue.com> <CAGnRvup0qqmHy0Bwe1hCWGDKPYmG602kC1HJ_T-89Ef=uPMdQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:17:26 +0000
Message-Id: <1447863447016-f0b4ceba-a9f19bca-2dc6fa77@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/e02grmyM_COdnW4EErX4JMDBJMs>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:17:33 -0000

Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 11:04 AM Henning Rogge wrote:
> I don't think DTLS with PSK is much better than WPA2 with PSK...

True.   And that does rule out tinydtls but there are quite a few other DTLS implementations available.   Is your point that we need to say more than just that DTLS is MTI?   Certainly the text requiring DTLS to protect symmetric key TLVs would need to be updated to address this point!


--
Sent from Whiteout Mail - https://whiteout.io

My PGP key: https://keys.whiteout.io/mellon@fugue.com