IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] dnssdext wg bof at ietf 87

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Thu, 27 June 2013 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E916D21F9E58 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HXZHYwo7JOiA for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF39511E80A5 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5RK0th8007024 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:00:55 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r5RK0th8007024
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1372363255; bh=N7hmlIGH25N/X3U+JDsNbHsilvc=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=5kQ6P91z3XydSNIt80fNZ2MCgpItJS5B97AQLsDSccwOT3KvT438QD6p1xrPruK7m XJ7yU9Xf9SzXDyd4wuUpBvsoERnA413Yo4NFPjNQh0/dQbzo7mMfeBnfA8m8zcYmLP /xzXrcUIaPrMxeILPrq5/wmd8fwOKEJUu94ZEmgQ=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p5QL0y0544517730eE ret-id none; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:00:55 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5RJxZsq019259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:59:36 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7a0+jFubLqqogAGU=rHak82LCSR5N104w4T3n_jmcJaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:59:37 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|29862d64c7374bec0300374827ff409dp5QL0y03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A85C835A-A915-4146-A66B-E980FA39DD05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <CAA93jw7a0+jFubLqqogAGU=rHak82LCSR5N104w4T3n_jmcJaA@mail.gmail.com> <A85C835A-A915-4146-A66B-E980FA39DD05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p5QL0y054451773000; tid=p5QL0y0544517730eE; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r5RK0th8007024
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [homenet] dnssdext wg bof at ietf 87
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:01:01 -0000

On 27 Jun 2013, at 19:32, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> I tend to regard the naming/service discovery problem as the biggest
> one in a routed home network (regardless of the routing protocol,
> prefix distribution mechanism, etc, etc)
> 
> so I am pleased to see a bof scheduled for what we were calling
> mdnsext and now the more accurate dnssdext.
> (I think I've seen a typo for dnsnext?)
> 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart#dnssdext
> 
> In there is the open question about homenet's relationship to this
> group. Is it the intent of homenet wg to defer to the decisions of the
> dnssdext working group, or...

There will need to be close linkage between the groups (assuming dnssdext is formed). I would expect this to be discussed in Berlin, and that there will be some steer from the ADs, given both are Int Area. One point to note is that the dnssdext scope is larger than just homenet, including enterprise and campus environments. 

The name of the dnssdext BoF was originally sdnssd (scalable dns sd), but that was changed in case anyone glancing at the meeting schedule assumed it was a SDN-related BoF.  The final name of the WG, again if formed, is to be determined.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email