[homenet] =?Windows-1252?Q?RE:__Fwd:_New_Liaison_Statement, _"Broadband_For?= um Work on “Hybrid Access for Broadband Networks” (WT-348)"

Xueli <xueli@huawei.com> Wed, 22 October 2014 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <xueli@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1274F1A8F4C; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-YAkwJ0e9yZ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B231A8F3E; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNX59050; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:48:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:48:38 +0100
Received: from NKGEML504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.168]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:48:25 +0800
From: Xueli <xueli@huawei.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Thread-Topic: =?Windows-1252?Q?[homenet]_Fwd:_New_Liaison_Statement, _"Broadband_Forum_W?= =?Windows-1252?Q?ork_on_=93Hybrid_Access_for_Broadband_Networks=94_(WT-34?= =?Windows-1252?Q?8)"?=
Thread-Index: AQHP7WIcOm96HPXJ7U2H19EDbAXxJpw7zesg
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:48:25 +0000
Message-ID: <01FE63842C181246BBE4CF183BD159B4490350AD@nkgeml504-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <20141021160652.24101.60334.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4BBD7952-84F7-40F9-9034-8DD7A1F2A05C@nominum.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130EA59FC@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <E8CCD261-8A5C-4249-AF65-468FB1441647@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8CCD261-8A5C-4249-AF65-468FB1441647@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.86]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_01FE63842C181246BBE4CF183BD159B4490350ADnkgeml504mbxchi_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/fOIr7w74JKCBgotpC25Bl3I0tiQ
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: [homenet] =?windows-1252?q?=3D=3FWindows-1252=3FQ=3FRE=3A=5F=5FFw?= =?windows-1252?q?d=3A=5FNew=5FLiaison=5FStatement=2C_=5F=22Broadband=5FFo?= =?windows-1252?q?r=3F=3D_um_Work_on_=93Hybrid_Access_for_Broadband_Networ?= =?windows-1252?q?ks=94_=28WT-348=29=22?=
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:49:00 -0000

Hello



Thanks Barbara to send this liaison out.

Hybrid Access network is that Residential gateway (RG, or CPE) is extended with more than two access lines

(e.g. DSL + LTE) in order to provide higher bandwidth for the customers. The scenario and architecture are shown as follows

[cid:image002.jpg@01CF9A07.BF8CD480]



Right now, we have two individual drafts, one for architecture and requirements, and the other one is for an optional solution.

The draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhwxz-hybrid-access-network-architecture-00 ; ) proposes the architecture and gap analysis.

The solution draft proposes one option for the solutions, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-heileyli-gre-notifications-00

We did not combine them as one draft, because we believe there may be other candidates, and we would like to have further discussions in the related groups and IETF.

We used to present it in Homenet in Toronto.



Now the authors have invited Orange to join this architecture work. We will send out the new version of these drafts soon.

We are glad to invite the experts for comments.



Best Regards

Li Xue on the co-authors behalf





-----Original Message-----

From: homenet [mailto:homenet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon

Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:05 AM

To: STARK, BARBARA H

Cc: HOMENET Working Group

Subject: Re: [homenet] Fwd: New Liaison Statement, "Broadband Forum Work on “Hybrid Access for Broadband Networks” (WT-348)"



On Oct 21, 2014, at 2:55 PM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

> FYI. I made sure they were aware of IETF mif and homenet activities in this area. I intend to try to prevent having to track efforts that try to do the same thing in two different ways. But some of the BBF effort may be focused on what can be done around "bonding" of multiple interfaces that are under the control of a single service provider. I don't see this in mif or homenet.



Thanks.   I couldn't really tell what was being proposed from the Liaison statement, so this information is helpful.



_______________________________________________

homenet mailing list

homenet@ietf.org

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet