Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

[Philip Homburg <[e-mail]>]

In your letter dated Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:58:43 +0200 you wrote:
>Please understand that there are way more non-geeks out there that have
>no interest in computers except "use them" than there are geeks who care
>about IP addressing.  *Our* job is to make it work for *them*, without
>forcing our world view on them ("they need to be able to put a static
>IP address in DNS!" - no, my mom doesn't need to do that)

Our current 'world view' is that companies get stable addresses. Consumers get
crap.

We invent complicated stuff like dynamically turning ULA on and off that nobody
else uses. We force renumbering in the name of privacy, etc.

We start by giving consumers a swamp and then try to build something on top of
it.

We make choices, like the DNS server has to be in the router, because only the
router knows about the current prefix, etc.