IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A624A12D558 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BUdPUd1wu0cS for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6842312D5D0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id m64so60733894lfd.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LBeAaaMEnJw+3dy1qGDgX0o0ndBnLE6zbzoyIEWcHX4=; b=bWOTNNIXO8WtDRdOfPhpZUgAeMvzjlboLoXCuAcIBkKYdas6nkfJ597mWh/iBbmJqh OG28VJHU4D8VUpqvcnAWYK5CafSctoFA+ED5IsOi+VgrLBrOOmUVIZM3tAebx3WWFasv NxmCW6K2/GEuVLocFjSBrxfNgPf2D423vIyZ3mCywTvHMxzwSWlpQiG9/OEH/T3UBETQ ZgyeUfDi2+eUsTX28r1A/RzorVwBijcftqCBzd+B3kPOvTh/RG/48tkrC7EgKINJGVxy 4JjYP/y9gBvk/5GC2XiCKLLH8Sc1i8tCerlVeDlk/KZydYrgGwPh1pPle3jLM88otFj0 q3EQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LBeAaaMEnJw+3dy1qGDgX0o0ndBnLE6zbzoyIEWcHX4=; b=SQ+oCxsfngYFhceMfHxU1cA/ACwKeaw/rdX7Mi+/MIdSaXBFpGM6tzL9Pau5GOhMNb E7XUe6JH9WKkLunHJlg8v8/u+UQ1e5yEjCetyvPAfGklEG5kUweozgtClB85yCSvJb9w DeUUgx35rLERjnh3BHxV+lh+7FfLwdN6GQUKASONsT7QpmGiBAyEEd2FCyXXjG0Nu/jF xebv+4ABcUhtsvzLDXyOp85xjRtf3NXl/p767iniKdZb9kWOvX5E5pDrPddlV1VjO5Jc 1LAGfkuuWvLNn7zFC42/ioY6HAOT7qF4j/UmfzFCAuGi0sks+dvd9VRL6g5n/9PdjXt/ lGAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWZVaDGZtfnP7v80tLV8mAl/X5Exi4mJXykCpYO3rC8M+wN73mQN3B/SBL6RPbC0WMw08cUT+1Sz+2Fsw==
X-Received: by 10.25.8.204 with SMTP id 195mr2220409lfi.132.1462999037078; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <878tzgh17r.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <6E709688-414A-4AFB-AEAE-56BAE0469583@coote.org> <87oa93vz8e.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <917CFE11-2386-4B0D-8A81-F87764AC09A4@coote.org> <87lh47vtpe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <02CF43FB-CF81-4C0C-84E1-A8DFB27B3F8C@coote.org> <87lh44fff7.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <48A9C52C-85BC-4123-A3ED-FB269AD03126@iki.fi> <87eg9wfctc.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nq1CTMmQHFQXnaFY73SyRPKpWagiMVfrHODakbeT2Wxw@mail.gmail.com> <87a8kj3r7p.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nN+ih8xpBV_-T_JaGtbBG6d5zYqW==tph8yN_UB34NNw@mail.gmail.com> <56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|87dc38b1e390496e02166dafe2490d8as44D0U03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <57333B3F.7000009@globis.net> <CC759790-4F9B-47B8-A42C-A85F78AC9773@jisc.ac.uk> <57335AB6.8060305@globis.net> <87mvnwh81u.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nu98pXdDzVgZ2yW7xe8mwA=O+zmoGS8XLs_NLbNUaKFQ@mail.gmail.com> <87k2j0h789.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1n_-XrLtqm_sKGqaHPw1q4pgKyir-bvv=cbwE_vgHDPMA@mail.gmail.com> <87inykh6n9.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1kSKEqjsG5KN165h6YUALbY4eeRYb3Y_9ye3mN_RSnbyg@mail.gmail.com> <87d1osh39h.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1ksB1wCEfjqCVAn_Eca4Bh5vPy3SEO3bBGOWHJfX6zXxg@mail.gmail.com> <878tzgh17r.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 16:36:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kGtUGP68e44FOH6yuw0AvDmK8A4bNW+1YpXv31ywzvQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ebdc4e985b40532970111"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/h8a7JP-esWF00D4tq3qa69OPtnc>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 20:37:39 -0000

Spoken like a network administrator.   Of course, homenets have to be able
to renumber, but there is no "I" involved.   So the naming protocol has to
work with renumbering; ideally though intra-homenet communications would
use the homenet's ULA, and so renumbering wouldn't happen other than when
two homenets merged, and then it wouldn't be urgent.

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <
jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:

> >>> So perhaps you think of DNS data as being higher-layer than routing
> data
> >>> and numbering data?
>
> >> Do you not?
>
> > No. Why are names different than numbers?
>
> I should be able to renumber without telling my users.
>
> -- Juliusz
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email