Re: [homenet] Introduction to draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming

Mark Andrews <> Fri, 01 June 2018 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1F4124234 for <>; Thu, 31 May 2018 17:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C_9bfmnPlyx6 for <>; Thu, 31 May 2018 17:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10D8124205 for <>; Thu, 31 May 2018 17:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8741F3AB003; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 00:57:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33BBE16008C; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 00:57:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BAF16005C; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 00:57:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id wXk8LdRdi7jv; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 00:57:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06599160054; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 00:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Mark Andrews <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:57:00 +1000
Cc: Michael Thomas <>, HOMENET <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <10568.1527686230@localhost> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
To: Ted Lemon <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Introduction to draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:57:07 -0000

On the Mac I just press the ‘-‘ button on the list of printers to remove the old entry.

I suspect most devices WILL NOT REMEMBER old printers.  Macs are a exception because their heritage is manually configured printers.  You will get to see the current list and that is just that.  I think this is really a non-issue.  The old printer is gone.  There is a new printer with a different name.

If a device really wants to be known by two names it can register itself twice.


> On 1 Jun 2018, at 10:39 am, Ted Lemon <> wrote:
> On May 31, 2018, at 4:27 PM, Michael Thomas <> wrote:
>> With a CNAME, you wouldn't need to deprecate the other... it's just an alias that you have control of.
>> From the UI perspective, whatever is presenting names to the user can prefer the human-given name over
>> the auto-generated name, right? We wouldn't need to standardize anything then.
> Michael, I don't think you've really understood the issue here.   Let me try and explain it all at once, since the explanation was actually scattered across several messages.
> There are two pieces to this.   First, there's the thing that publishes the name.  That's DNSSD.   There's no problem with that end of things.   If you change the name, the device just appears with its new name, and everything is fine.   That's our piece of the puzzle, and it already works.
> The problem is that hosts tend to remember names.   On MacOS, for instance, if you configure a printer, the host remembers the printer forevermore.   It's no problem to configure a new printer, but if you change the name that the printer advertises, there will be a stale configuration on the host pointing to the old name, and the user will have to configure a new printer to get access to the old printer.
> So what we are talking about here actually breaks DNSSD's good behavior.   We don't want DNSSD to publish two names.   We don't want DNSSD to publish a CNAME.   That would just be extra garbage that would have to be maintained forever.
> What we want is a way for the host to notice that the device's name has changed.   We want the device to have some identity other than the name that doesn't change when the name changes.   And we actually have this in the registration protocol, which is another draft being published in the DNSSD working group.   That protocol has the host generating a public/private key pair, and using the public key as an identity.   It uses this identity to claim the name, but it wouldn't be that much work to also specify that hosts should use that identifier to notice that a device has a new name and update the name in the user interface.
> When I talk about UI, I'm really talking about the API behind the UI.   Having a management API for homenet would be a good thing.   Possibly it could just be done with HNCP.
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list

Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: