Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 17 September 2019 13:29 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2105E12084E for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGoAvuDPEcP0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 385A91200BA for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x8HDTpna078991; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:29:51 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FDBC2069DA; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:29:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F36020406D; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:29:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x8HDToWV025176; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:29:50 +0200
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>
References: <ac988227-162c-2af1-98a8-aecde8d1bb68@gmail.com> <449C0C62-C642-4FF6-97E6-27144BA3F760@fugue.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b6f0b4ad-af5e-ca65-1c5e-de4465959891@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:29:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <449C0C62-C642-4FF6-97E6-27144BA3F760@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/jBeGixyHc0h5W0r4gmdff1e2tug>
Subject: Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:29:56 -0000
Le 17/09/2019 à 14:27, Ted Lemon a écrit : > On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:06 AM, Alexandre Petrescu > <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> > wrote: >> >> This draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 describes a YANG model for uCPE. >> A Customer Premises Entity is for enterpise and home networks. >> >> Is this draft appropriate here? >> > It’s a bit off-charter. It’s not necessarily a wrong thing to pursue > here, but you’d need to talk us into doing it, and more importantly > there’d need to be people here interested in working on it. It’s > likely that most people reading this have no idea what the draft is > about, so if you want to try to pursue it here, the first thing I’d > suggest you do is tell the WG what problem you are trying to solve. > :) Hi Ted, Thanks for the reply. As I do not author the draft, and my colleague is not subscribed to this list, I paste here his reply to your question: > It is not really clear if the draft is appropriate to the homenet wg. > One can state that this draft presents a tool/solution (service yang > model) for orchestator to manage the different uCPE equipment. uCPE > eqipment is not regular cpe/homenet device. > > uCPE is a host that hosts guest OSs. uCPE is like PC with virtualbox > where the VMs are running (VMs such as homenet router,cisco router, > firewall, SD-WAN.) Alex
- [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Ted Lemon