Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 17/09/2019 à 14:27, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:06 AM, Alexandre Petrescu 
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> wrote:
>> 
>> This draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 describes a YANG model for uCPE.
>> A Customer Premises Entity is for enterpise and home networks.
>> 
>> Is this draft appropriate here?
>> 
> It’s a bit off-charter.  It’s not necessarily a wrong thing to pursue
>  here, but you’d need to talk us into doing it, and more importantly
>  there’d need to be people here interested in working on it.  It’s
> likely that most people reading this have no idea what the draft is
> about, so if you want to try to pursue it here, the first thing I’d
> suggest you do is tell the WG what problem you are trying to solve.
> :)

Hi Ted,

Thanks for the reply.  As I do not author the draft, and my colleague is 
not subscribed to this list, I paste here his reply to your question:

> It is not really clear if the draft is appropriate to the homenet wg.
> One can state that this draft presents a tool/solution (service yang
> model) for orchestator to manage the different uCPE equipment. uCPE
> eqipment is not regular cpe/homenet device.
> 
> uCPE is a host that hosts guest OSs. uCPE is like PC with virtualbox
> where the VMs are running (VMs such as homenet router,cisco router,
> firewall, SD-WAN.)

Alex