Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 29 October 2014 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566821A87AC; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcUACjvWqkD4; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C721A879D; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19429203AA; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:25:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 1077263A84; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE45763A80; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|17ee7d75db17a3a1b8e43f85ebccb07bq9RJju03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5C2EFB4E-925B-4252-BE58-894F9C061EA7@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <20141020204033.GD236844@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> <20141022190653.GB868521@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> <DFE4317C-E4B6-44AB-AED4-2FBBBD2888DA@cisco.com> <5C2EFB4E-925B-4252-BE58-894F9C061EA7@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|17ee7d75db17a3a1b8e43f85ebccb07bq9RJju03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5C2EFB4E-925B-4252-BE58-894F9C061EA7@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:24:03 -0400
Message-ID: <28735.1414607043@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/jLdnCG-3K3ggXCs7wwhFIPfdtVk
Cc: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "Fred Baker \(fred\)" <fred@cisco.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:24:13 -0000

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
    > Homenet has ‘designed in’ future multihoming, which is rare today. In
    > the homenet case the multihoming may presumably be more commonly for
    > different services to the home?

It's true that real multihoming (in the home...) is rare.

There are a multitude of off-the-shelf SOHO routers which support multiple
uplinks via NAPT.  I have setup this kind of thing up for a few dozen
friends' companies over the years... usually via a cablemodel + DSL (from
different suppliers) because we are protecting from a combination of
backhaul events and "customer service".

All of the downtime I've seen in the past ten years in my home office has
been due to "initiatives" from "customer service".

So I am very happy with the features that we have built-in, and I think with
the growth of 3G we will see additional mechanisms.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-