Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05B81A8A98 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0IzFvZQ9-VW0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0AF1A8A64 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.63] (c-71-201-198-58.hsd1.il.comcast.net [71.201.198.58]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 390D22380423; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3B4E4A6-8CEB-4590-A457-44F939A7E939@steffann.nl>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:27:29 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6231BC6A-CF83-4B5A-835A-D7B8BEDDC3AC@fugue.com>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <7D59D80C-2BF0-428B-A872-B2922B2D0F98@fugue.com> <20141014154606.GA31092@Space.Net> <D3B4E4A6-8CEB-4590-A457-44F939A7E939@steffann.nl>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/jrxCjR-YZFH75G0SxiInlz6Zj2M
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gert_D=F6ring?= <gert@space.net>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:27:36 -0000

On Oct 14, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> One thing that does worry me is every application developer having to re-invent the code for all of this (find labels, actually implement the networking code correctly etc). I think a standard API should be available for all of this. Otherwise all operating system vendors and distributions will come up with something completely different which will make it even harder for the application developers to do the right thing.

It would be helpful if you could participate in the MIF working group, which is working on solving this problem.