Re: [homenet] New version draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02.txt

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 15 July 2014 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624411A0035 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.753
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.753 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id de2EYQ5D7wcy for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8316E1A0027 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.10.25] (c-50-148-182-215.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.148.182.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s6FJcwxL023934 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:38:59 -0700
Message-ID: <53C58350.3020006@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:38:56 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: homenet@ietf.org
References: <CADZyTkk6rUuFJ5Wds2hioBBQa9-kXDJxyg_gBGQ1R6u5CHF2Ww@mail.gmail.com> <87fvij5wdw.wl.jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTkk2bv7T-Bs_ckG4i2MpXVDRqLA2R1dQgrMVrPSckOy-GQ@mail.gmail.com> <87k37uy703.wl.jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTk=YgD=JtyDpEz8TXOQmHxKzBoiEZbbW0LhZQy2GaKLqZQ@mail.gmail.com> <87vbrcydr9.wl.jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTk=kST4zPaPzz4DsAcCOtmYbQo-s2du+nEvJv0MSrneEMg@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTkmZ+rC99qeC7gFEwc4JBoX9sHBUpo7p89+VC6zY7Z8drQ@mail.gmail.com> <87d2dfb98w.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTk=U25=Yck8BL5nrzGAR7mPk5HWp0r0h2wYy5ruSOf6rsQ@mail.gmail.com> <87vbr6mv8t.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <7EEF5CD0-C3B8-4559-A75D-E55931F94F61@iki.fi> <21162.1405438875@sandelman.ca> <7ioawqpqcv.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <7B5390DD-6969-4E26-A85E-0B436F48448F@fugue.com> <87a98acvxe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <E01C736F-75C0-436C-A283-28763208E46E@iki.fi> <F689B456-2A87-41BE-8884-ED23BD35D748@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <F689B456-2A87-41BE-8884-ED23BD35D748@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/kB4R9wFwosHVNcSZkBOhxERWZfY
Subject: Re: [homenet] New version draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:39:01 -0000

On 7/15/14, 12:00 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>; wrote:
>> The mechanism should not be tied to the particular ISPs either, except perhaps optionally.
> I think the motivation with Daniel's draft was to provide support for the optional case where the ISP wants to support it, because you get some better results in that case, but clearly the full solution needs to work "well enough" with partial or nonexistent ISP cooperation.

That pretty much means that you need a solution that isn't bolted to 
DHCP, right?
Or at least, that DHCP is only providing a default discovery mechanism 
which my CPE
is completely free to ignore. Beyond the discovery, it ought to work 
identically regardless
of whether it's my first hop ISP(s), or 20 hops away in Nairobi, right?

Mike