Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[e-mail]>]

Ted Lemon <[e-mail]> writes:

> El 16 ag 2017, a les 9:40, Ted Lemon <[e-mail]> va escriure:
>> Ah, if this is your concern, I think that's answered by the whitelisting stuff I was talking about earlier.   But in this case you really do need to have separate caches per PvD, and the MPvD-aware clients on the net need to be able to use them.   We could say that this is optional to support, though, and so if you want to pay for one router with this feature, that router's resolver can be advertised in the PvD-aware path.
>
> BTW, I think we have probably carried this discussion as far as is
> useful until a new rev of the draft is done. Daniel is working on a
> new draft, he said, and when he's done his bit I'll do a pass as well
> and try to capture the changes we've discussed here, and then we can
> iterate again. :)

Yup, fine with me :)

-Toke