IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-dot-14.txt

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sat, 02 September 2017 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AA9132355 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 16:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_g5g_rnYaqS for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 16:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1F5132397 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 16:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 187so18718916wmn.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 16:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UZu7Bwng5AA9FJLmtGQX6sVWKajvjZtvQByRFmC3ylc=; b=j4ozsBNKAByfcVU6JKd6cmBpusgv+aAXXYBw6T2Dd3DpWN9NpTyWpi98zGvwFibQQx 1J1dNglCjaucqwZLnrbSMVRpP7Vu9qUW6vVA0/htoy59N719jwsqUFfb0KDFi557fUFk snUKYAzyxw/NitoGgD3HRI/z+YvGzTxmKrREAj2EhudBb0pP7owDoHq2pGu+Hqw1mRGq iA+Qu1ZMdsI4Ja/E3d2mBuVt5qEX0QGwrLzBFhtvRaa1sXxaWmi9xBAvUkTgidr+Un76 1zc8N512/GmGJm5Sold04vyYAsfwt+hYCuY2infp9XW9b3g+ln3vnsuyvt4Pt4TjPCD/ Xolg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UZu7Bwng5AA9FJLmtGQX6sVWKajvjZtvQByRFmC3ylc=; b=F27n47rZjh/qJmFfG319qEq0Xfe8YnUQWPcTDhgHhXmLSejBh3rXP4ixcfDSc8trHW FwLgncNU3JwT+0ixZqFmgM1yDM1sHpS62Adbi9ZZBMJ3U4aOE091iyL68OWJmQnpG3BL n3MkkJ3+NegjeqEj5xvs9MXNy6NDSShXrexg0Jsgvlu55xNn1OG+ZxsEdM7c+f9leo9q VHwip4hDcWD2zI9SIu2HG3ftmDbVngF2KtU5y4UAvI2PCH8hhri9DHRfjI+vbHFxh/MS c2vvAItfQOaDqq+gw5ZKW+prXltoNt5+JcZnVaqGiDmYqs3Y+YAPzDwsO+S3SjS23zPQ aIpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjXiRb7v8kwEfbe7wjFkGqoWDlAmuMJM5XI+Uc+67iNr+fY9VS1 t+XM6dKVqfIOT3gJIKmMRMEw6ZmcScwBXX4kfQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7oDBYmCjgRT6Ygs+d2vMn7LJqFmMM4x7ed2oVrero2zpUs9ciPiRZ/h7eYt6DAyfUtgCGMjifXq8DJhU2xmwo=
X-Received: by 10.28.175.76 with SMTP id y73mr1590655wme.33.1504394728960; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 16:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.164.135 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 16:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <59A9AAE8.9090901@mathemainzel.info>
References: <150428805872.6417.9525310755360551475@ietfa.amsl.com> <59A9AAE8.9090901@mathemainzel.info>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 19:24:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJA-B9dYp6V1+VhkcfCeQXqfE60MqcuDkbnR+6CqWYxbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/lO3AxAnEaJTHsBVaWppfl-smssY>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-dot-14.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:25:33 -0000

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Walter H. <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just one question for some better understanding ...
>
> I read this line
>
> "The domain name 'home.arpa.' is to be used for naming within
> residential homenets."
>
> when this draft becomes an RFC - hopefully this year 2017 - then there
> exists
> an RFC, which gives you a domain name you can use in a home network/LAN
> without conflicting to other things ..., the domain name 'home.arpa'
>
> but there still doesn't exist any for company networks, they most commonly
> use
> the domain name 'local', which I already noticed, that this conflicts to RFC
> 6762 ...

Around 2 months ago (AKA, *just* before the draft cutoff) I wrote
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00 -- this is
specifically designed to be a reservation for a companies /
organizations / test networks / disconnected networks, etc to be able
to use.

So far it has generated basically no discussion -- some of the purpose
was simply to more fully discuss the issues, etc surrounding this sort
of issue.
Note that the document is not very well written, it was written on a
plane and submitted in a rush.
W



>
> Thanks,
> Walter
>
>
> On 01.09.2017 19:47, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Home Networking WG of the IETF.
>>
>>          Title           : Special Use Domain 'home.arpa.'
>>          Authors         : Pierre Pfister
>>                            Ted Lemon
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-homenet-dot-14.txt
>>         Pages           : 11
>>         Date            : 2017-09-01
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email