IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8375 (6378)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 02 January 2021 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9011A3A0965 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 06:33:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tni8hDbxwEEg for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 06:33:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24AD3A0964 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 06:33:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FE5BE20; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 14:33:28 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lbiXr1mHvKdW; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 14:33:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.119] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F4A1BE1C; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 14:33:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1609598003; bh=6bXdEM1/NFsHwxrQTjj+iVPhy4cP3jQWrLV+/3qqZ0Q=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ys/ZiiW8i1XCCf28uB2vbzEiGgHzySkMxh0bPQwS88o4tPWL3Dw1Fou1I1uzSaMqi KucX7mqVJXWywar2g2LdtgNPyIxykalIXn5oaXN508g72r92k8IN1AoUh8sPwM7N5u StyihxEVYHECpcGOOql90S2BrkOWdcr1YGbi5+/w=
To: pierre.pfister@darou.fr, mellon@fugue.com, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, bs7652@att.com
Cc: ksmatharu@gmail.com, homenet@ietf.org
References: <20210102082708.EABF0F40721@rfc-editor.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <92093695-34c7-e965-c261-805f7ce86ba4@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 14:33:21 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210102082708.EABF0F40721@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Osdy1IskTZiW4OoZ2NIFrqqCB6J5UCPQl"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/leq6myGLmPa__MlhHgiEZHqi7E4>
Subject: Re: [homenet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8375 (6378)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 14:33:36 -0000

Any opinions on this from authors/list? My take would be that
this can be rejected as inclusion of full stops within quotes
is stylistically correct and that there's no technical issue
with including the root's dot in a DNS name. But maybe some
other convention has been followed for DNS RFCs in the past?

Cheers,
S.

On 02/01/2021 08:27, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8375,
> "Special-Use Domain 'home.arpa.'".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6378
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Kulvinder Matharu <ksmatharu@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: GLOBAL
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> "home.arpa."
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> "home.arpa"
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The domain "home.arpa." is used throughout the document. The domain should, instead, be "home.arpa".
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8375 (draft-ietf-homenet-dot-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Special-Use Domain 'home.arpa.'
> Publication Date    : May 2018
> Author(s)           : P. Pfister, T. Lemon
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Home Networking
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email