IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] version of -13 of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation posted

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 March 2021 23:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C910E3A1682 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6nL0ZI3ywFH for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa29.google.com (mail-vk1-xa29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96FFA3A1681 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa29.google.com with SMTP id h136so1543389vka.7 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7aGqU+KSzzAsKFGE5hS3tQ0lnlsloIlVh8DDT+sbuqw=; b=WbB/0KGVeSIemMf72Uit2YuY7WJM1PDURsjAD8iRQ5nbXWFluUvb353l6Upzt5jHGH wHs1wgcDm7X8rToKsUAe4e+s7a8pMGkWYz+SwVbvJd5KpCICVFN+5zCrAxnQyrWbYOEo GHgoTnUPmPLeypaPu61/pS1+7IxmunrvweMXnWPnQm7/LVxP23CpifTJKPIHslnJweGP /cdIJjB+5GtJOjh45u9ijxRaCCWon47xnEtx7+Em8Eypy6V23ZydnLpbU13espGN81qR HwDqzHjiibx+ETDik8IpZg6r6qBeSUv00s8dPx7sF29ZEcMzV+x3+zMmaayDon4QrChD OCNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7aGqU+KSzzAsKFGE5hS3tQ0lnlsloIlVh8DDT+sbuqw=; b=Mp630rrZiJ3+ilPiJHVCuG8haa/wGgq+5k8Y64Ntji0KKInUI4tgJOlz64OmqAwYx0 GZuko7uSlIjpfBvc832gnHB/UKylkT7dmsZ+QdPgrfiF69xfBMrBbWfWACeoW7GcC/2x Xt1XBLiAV/4Cf26n5jMCxbMcgVJ3F91+jiBmMFmGwEQGUGhhVmHoPdTxELuE2iEd5KCM Yu3a2FdtmYknjhhokRCSy3vuQUQT2UC/VfUfwpvOuFGEiuBltKm0f3Dsbc+E/klyv49D Ud84kWzWgvbFtaCVE6HppqnpCtQJbMfqTenxrQHGGHC7Ch6mXiAlJULJSMXI631rkbkJ SNsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531cTbpxqBq/2ap7cgSfmgZf3z8YbhOwNsp2eheZzKOV1lrkL5b2 pbAelC3tKHE8OILnH0CXFPCgP18yWFpm5/QB1ItSOJOk
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy86zZCwcsXidjbiZ1AVydsrAs0A07nYT539m52qH7T0yZO4U0Mw2ENC6EeThHkk8XDnAH83EPKkElInRTZQ9E=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:7d06:: with SMTP id y6mr10432579vkc.0.1616802116100; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161678698341.29995.3905901904017128291@ietfa.amsl.com> <14716.1616788049@localhost> <ee3770bc-d30c-2e24-b9a2-c18a39273bee@mtcc.com>
In-Reply-To: <ee3770bc-d30c-2e24-b9a2-c18a39273bee@mtcc.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:41:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkkP_-Fyp-h3yYYbyXPdcir7OnOL2jDUzSBzarTvnaWgog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Cc: homenet <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cd682d05be7913a6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/m2xcyVnHSdnBsbbaDNkicPFoWws>
Subject: Re: [homenet] version of -13 of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation posted
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 23:42:02 -0000

Hi,

No, DANE can be used but is not mandated.


Yours,
Daniel

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:00 PM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:

>
> On 3/26/21 12:47 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I completed the CDDL description for section 14.
> > We hummed and hawed about YANG vs CDDL for describing this non-normative
> bit
> > of JSON, and settled on CDDL.  I think that I need to revise Appendix B
> to be sure it matches.
> >
> > We have posted -13 because it has been more than two months, and while
> this
> > version still has a number of edits needed, we needed a firmer base on
> which
> > to discuss.
> >
> > I was reading the diff, and I saw:
> >
> >    XX, YYYY and ZZZZ as well-known ports in section 5.
> >    I thought that we didn't need any well-known ports?
> >    Can you comment Ray?
> >
> > In reading the diff I have fixed one "teh"->"the" typo, and some {
> missing in
> > the reference for DANE.
> >
> > There is a lot of cut text since -12, and maybe some of it was valuable.
> >
> Wait, this using DANE? I guess I'll have to read it.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email