Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8AF12D54A for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VoLK0nSu441M for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C2C12D0B1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id y84so58815283lfc.0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vICxEQPP+bMbzFJ8jM2TgovJ3gPY4qVpm5l3fj3DXDM=; b=SSfz2p9uIhqoQIcospKD1KpUo8qAC8xLLTOpmFHlk0B1f2aIRPkynte33FoPDz+Uxt 5SCpaboE7LmG3/cfiNhFz7Q0ltPNpy5DUdtt0ia4duvNnoj6yNX9heZ5KB9x7J56hey7 ud4WJWFgouJDVruEAfkYaY/+aSIu9nHJcPjoA6sr2sbji2/KS0ENbLJ3zYFjXryjmimX uIsbAE+9Zh3oV4oa7HNvOFQvnTYAlqZ7Ig5pmKc+0zVqtVvlH9eiKdv3dvDDM18LTY8Y Q/E+w3zZ+L9lRbFt/3yX2I6JZVpFCXvGSERp70/15OYcI5bea/x2ctCInKFqzeOK5u1P eb4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vICxEQPP+bMbzFJ8jM2TgovJ3gPY4qVpm5l3fj3DXDM=; b=abwGZs6lkPmEMInrzjrQpKgyhXHKP/M/uuN6DKdmot7E17ADLoqNYJURJCC51SUnZ6 ZWk3ColrmcOrPHTpcqMYJOiwofNm3P1GsYeWvAbGkjf5xAqJLE6wBYhey3trUVgy8tKM Zqjttp/9FDqKJK57fNFBqa+zvLqwpHhdQQ0yUCm6k+5S09y0ySwLa5xeRuubTVeSIEeG xst6wfGKkoShTWSWCNZQISS4R+5IWgLxDOXK4z0dYU70TDUek6GnQNaQmEasyJKt7sfI /je4IGBbuisZcDDoN0aWupGoFuuXsy3AD9JNigpEkiJJJZxk0J4WXXPg5SlF5zRYn6JH 98xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVl12o+WFlwJB1Hcc2pJzVGj6TXBB68AgVW2jA1ZHXGVWaMs8KF/KE2BDN0AdAWFmWHCxFnehQai/UOaw==
X-Received: by 10.25.145.19 with SMTP id t19mr2355855lfd.109.1462990934630; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87d1osh39h.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <6E709688-414A-4AFB-AEAE-56BAE0469583@coote.org> <87oa93vz8e.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <917CFE11-2386-4B0D-8A81-F87764AC09A4@coote.org> <87lh47vtpe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <02CF43FB-CF81-4C0C-84E1-A8DFB27B3F8C@coote.org> <87lh44fff7.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <48A9C52C-85BC-4123-A3ED-FB269AD03126@iki.fi> <87eg9wfctc.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nq1CTMmQHFQXnaFY73SyRPKpWagiMVfrHODakbeT2Wxw@mail.gmail.com> <87a8kj3r7p.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nN+ih8xpBV_-T_JaGtbBG6d5zYqW==tph8yN_UB34NNw@mail.gmail.com> <56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|87dc38b1e390496e02166dafe2490d8as44D0U03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <57333B3F.7000009@globis.net> <CC759790-4F9B-47B8-A42C-A85F78AC9773@jisc.ac.uk> <57335AB6.8060305@globis.net> <87mvnwh81u.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nu98pXdDzVgZ2yW7xe8mwA=O+zmoGS8XLs_NLbNUaKFQ@mail.gmail.com> <87k2j0h789.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1n_-XrLtqm_sKGqaHPw1q4pgKyir-bvv=cbwE_vgHDPMA@mail.gmail.com> <87inykh6n9.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1kSKEqjsG5KN165h6YUALbY4eeRYb3Y_9ye3mN_RSnbyg@mail.gmail.com> <87d1osh39h.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:21:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1ksB1wCEfjqCVAn_Eca4Bh5vPy3SEO3bBGOWHJfX6zXxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11401faaf802de0532951ef4
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/mI9ZA1uDbJztvV2GGCoLxbSHgxw>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 18:22:21 -0000

No.   Why are names different than numbers?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <
jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>; wrote:

> >> No (HNCP manages quite a bit of hard state, unfortunately). I think
> >> I meant "able to interpret higher-layer data", but I'm no longer sure
> ;-)
>
> > So perhaps you think of DNS data as being higher-layer than routing data
> > and numbering data?
>
> Do you not?
>
> -- Juliusz
>